Fiehn Anne-Marie Kanstrup, Grauslund Morten, Glenthøj Anders, Melchior Linea Cecilie, Vainer Ben, Willemoe Gro Linno
Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Frederik V's Vej 11, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark,
Virchows Arch. 2015 Jan;466(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1675-6. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
Medullary carcinoma of the colon is a rare variant of colorectal cancer claimed to have a more favorable prognosis than conventional adenocarcinomas. The histopathologic appearance may be difficult to distinguish from poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic interobserver agreement and to characterize the immunohistochemical and molecular differences between these two subgroups. Fifteen cases initially classified as medullary carcinoma and 30 cases of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas were included. Two pathologists reviewed the slides independently without knowledge of the original diagnosis and subgrouped the tumors into the two entities. Agreement was reached in 31 of 45 cases (69 %) with kappa = 0.32. An extensive immunohistochemical panel was performed, and KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutational status was assessed. Of the 31 cases with diagnostic agreement, the expression of only MLH-1 along with corresponding expression of PMS-2 differed significantly (p = 0.04). A high rate of BRAF mutations was detected in both subgroups without significant differences. Expression of MLH-1 was superior in dividing the tumors into two separate entities with significant differences in CK20 (p = 0.005) expression and in the rate of BRAF mutations (p = 0.0035). In conclusion, medullary carcinomas of the colon are difficult to discriminate from poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma even with the help of immunohistochemical and molecular analyses. This raises the question whether these morphological subtypes should be maintained or whether an alternative classification of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas based on MLH-1 status rather than morphology should be suggested.
结肠髓样癌是一种罕见的结直肠癌变体,据称其预后比传统腺癌更有利。其组织病理学表现可能难以与低分化腺癌区分开来。本研究旨在评估观察者间的诊断一致性,并描述这两个亚组之间的免疫组化和分子差异。纳入了15例最初分类为髓样癌的病例和30例低分化腺癌病例。两位病理学家在不知道原始诊断的情况下独立审查切片,并将肿瘤分为这两个实体。45例中有31例(69%)达成一致,kappa值为0.32。进行了广泛的免疫组化检测,并评估了KRAS、NRAS和BRAF的突变状态。在31例诊断一致的病例中,只有MLH-1的表达以及相应的PMS-2表达有显著差异(p = 0.04)。在两个亚组中均检测到高比例的BRAF突变,但无显著差异。MLH-1的表达在将肿瘤分为两个独立实体方面更具优势,在CK20表达(p = 0.005)和BRAF突变率(p = 0.0035)方面有显著差异。总之,即使借助免疫组化和分子分析,结肠髓样癌也难以与低分化腺癌区分开来。这就提出了一个问题,即这些形态学亚型是否应保留,或者是否应建议基于MLH-1状态而非形态学对低分化结直肠腺癌进行另一种分类。