Suppr超能文献

具有三个关键词的正向联想强度(FAS)列表中的错误识别产生指标。

False recognition production indexes in forward associative strength (FAS) lists with three critical words.

作者信息

Beato María Soledad, Arndt Jason

机构信息

University of Salamanca.

出版信息

Psicothema. 2014;26(4):457-63. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.79.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

False memory illusions have been widely studied using the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm (DRM). In this paradigm, participants study words semantically related to a single nonpresented critical word. In a memory test critical words are often falsely recalled and recognized.

METHOD

The present study was conducted to measure the levels of false recognition for seventy-five Spanish DRM word lists that have multiple critical words per list. Lists included three critical words (e.g., HELL, LUCEFER, and SATAN) simultaneously associated with six studied words (e.g., devil, demon, fire, red, bad, and evil). Different levels of forward associative strength (FAS) between the critical words and their studied associates were used in the construction of the lists. Specifically, we selected lists with the highest FAS values possible and FAS was continuously decreased in order to obtain the 75 lists.

RESULTS

Six words per list, simultaneously associated with three critical words, were sufficient to produce false recognition. Furthermore, there was wide variability in rates of false recognition (e.g., 53% for DUNGEON, PRISON, and GRATES; 1% for BRACKETS, GARMENT, and CLOTHING). Finally, there was no correlation between false recognition and associative strength.

CONCLUSIONS

False recognition variability could not be attributed to differences in the forward associative strength.

摘要

背景

错误记忆错觉已通过迪斯/罗迪格 - 麦克德莫特范式(DRM)得到广泛研究。在该范式中,参与者学习与单个未呈现的关键单词语义相关的单词。在记忆测试中,关键单词经常被错误回忆和识别。

方法

本研究旨在测量75个西班牙语DRM单词列表的错误识别水平,每个列表有多个关键单词。列表包括三个关键单词(如“地狱”“路西法”和“撒旦”),它们同时与六个学习过的单词(如“魔鬼”“恶魔”“火”“红色”“坏的”和“邪恶的”)相关联。在构建列表时,使用了关键单词与其学习过的关联词之间不同水平的前向联想强度(FAS)。具体而言,我们选择了尽可能具有最高FAS值的列表,并不断降低FAS以获得75个列表。

结果

每个列表中与三个关键单词同时相关联的六个单词足以产生错误识别。此外,错误识别率存在很大差异(例如,“地牢”“监狱”和“格栅”的错误识别率为53%;“括号”“服装”和“衣物”的错误识别率为1%)。最后,错误识别与联想强度之间没有相关性。

结论

错误识别的变异性不能归因于前向联想强度的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验