Suppr超能文献

在学习过程中思考关键词对于在迪斯、罗迪格和麦克德莫特程序中的错误记忆来说是不必要的。

Thinking of critical words during study is unnecessary for false memory in the Deese, Roediger, and McDermott procedure.

作者信息

Seamon John G, Lee Ihno A, Toner Sarah K, Wheeler Rachel H, Goodkind Madeleine S, Birch Antoine D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wesleyan Univeristy, Middletown, CT 06459, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):526-31. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00492.

Abstract

Do participants in the Deese, Roediger, and McDermott (DRM) procedure demonstrate false memory because they think of nonpresented critical words during study and confuse them with words that were actually presented? In two experiments, 160 participants studied eight visually presented DRM lists at a rate of 2 s or 5 s per word. Half of the participants rehearsed silently: the other half rehearsed overtly. Following study, the participants' memory for the lists was tested by recall or recognition. Typical false memory results were obtained for both memory measures. More important, two new results were observed. First, a large majority of the overt-rehearsal participants spontaneously rehearsed approximately half of the critical words during study. Second, critical-word rehearsal at study enhanced subsequent false recall, but it had no effect on false recognition or remember judgments for falsely recognized critical words. Thinking of critical words during study was unnecessary for producing false memory.

摘要

在迪斯、罗迪格和麦克德莫特(DRM)程序中的参与者表现出错误记忆,是因为他们在学习过程中想到了未呈现的关键单词,并将其与实际呈现的单词混淆了吗?在两项实验中,160名参与者以每秒2个单词或每秒5个单词的速度学习了8个视觉呈现的DRM列表。一半的参与者进行默读复述;另一半进行出声复述。学习之后,通过回忆或识别测试参与者对列表的记忆。两种记忆测量方法都得到了典型的错误记忆结果。更重要的是,观察到了两个新结果。首先,绝大多数出声复述的参与者在学习过程中自发地复述了大约一半的关键单词。其次,学习时对关键单词的复述增强了随后的错误回忆,但对错误识别或对错误识别的关键单词的记住判断没有影响。在学习过程中想到关键单词对于产生错误记忆来说并非必要条件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验