Seamon John G, Lee Ihno A, Toner Sarah K, Wheeler Rachel H, Goodkind Madeleine S, Birch Antoine D
Department of Psychology, Wesleyan Univeristy, Middletown, CT 06459, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):526-31. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00492.
Do participants in the Deese, Roediger, and McDermott (DRM) procedure demonstrate false memory because they think of nonpresented critical words during study and confuse them with words that were actually presented? In two experiments, 160 participants studied eight visually presented DRM lists at a rate of 2 s or 5 s per word. Half of the participants rehearsed silently: the other half rehearsed overtly. Following study, the participants' memory for the lists was tested by recall or recognition. Typical false memory results were obtained for both memory measures. More important, two new results were observed. First, a large majority of the overt-rehearsal participants spontaneously rehearsed approximately half of the critical words during study. Second, critical-word rehearsal at study enhanced subsequent false recall, but it had no effect on false recognition or remember judgments for falsely recognized critical words. Thinking of critical words during study was unnecessary for producing false memory.
在迪斯、罗迪格和麦克德莫特(DRM)程序中的参与者表现出错误记忆,是因为他们在学习过程中想到了未呈现的关键单词,并将其与实际呈现的单词混淆了吗?在两项实验中,160名参与者以每秒2个单词或每秒5个单词的速度学习了8个视觉呈现的DRM列表。一半的参与者进行默读复述;另一半进行出声复述。学习之后,通过回忆或识别测试参与者对列表的记忆。两种记忆测量方法都得到了典型的错误记忆结果。更重要的是,观察到了两个新结果。首先,绝大多数出声复述的参与者在学习过程中自发地复述了大约一半的关键单词。其次,学习时对关键单词的复述增强了随后的错误回忆,但对错误识别或对错误识别的关键单词的记住判断没有影响。在学习过程中想到关键单词对于产生错误记忆来说并非必要条件。