• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第二语言中的虚假记忆:控制词汇意义知识的重要性。

False memory in a second language: The importance of controlling the knowledge of word meaning.

机构信息

Department of Basic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 May 11;18(5):e0285747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285747. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0285747
PMID:37167247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10174556/
Abstract

In the globalized world we live in, it is increasingly common for people to speak more than one language. Although research in psychology has been widely interested in the study of false memories with the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, to date, there is a scarcity of studies comparing false memories in the first and the second language (L1 and L2, respectively). It is noteworthy that one of the most studied variables in the DRM paradigm, the backward associative strength (BAS), has hardly been studied in the L2. Moreover, the only study that recently examined this matter found differences in the knowledge of L2-word meaning between the high-BAS and low-BAS lists, which would hinder the interpretation of the BAS effect in L2 false memories. Taking all this into account, the current work examined false memories in the L1 (Spanish) and the L2 (English) as a function of BAS overcoming the limitations of the previous study. We selected DRM lists using both Spanish and English free association norms and lists were constructed to vary in BAS values while controlling the knowledge of word meaning. Results showed that false recognition was greater in the L1 or dominant language than in the L2 or non-dominant language. Furthermore, BAS modulated the false recognition in both the L1 and the L2. That is, false recognition was higher in high-BAS than low-BAS lists in both languages. Sensitivity index from the signal-detection theory helped us gain further insight into these results. The main findings are discussed in the light of theoretical models from both the false memory and the second language processing literature. Finally, practical implications and future research are provided.

摘要

在我们生活的全球化世界中,越来越多的人会说不止一种语言。尽管心理学研究广泛关注使用 Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) 范式的虚假记忆研究,但迄今为止,比较第一语言 (L1) 和第二语言 (L2) 中的虚假记忆的研究很少。值得注意的是,DRM 范式中研究最多的变量之一——反向联想强度 (BAS),在 L2 中几乎没有被研究过。此外,最近唯一一项研究该问题的研究发现,高 BAS 和低 BAS 列表之间的 L2 单词含义知识存在差异,这将阻碍 L2 虚假记忆中 BAS 效应的解释。考虑到这一切,当前的工作检查了 L1(西班牙语)和 L2(英语)中的虚假记忆,作为克服先前研究局限性的方法。我们使用西班牙语和英语自由联想规范选择了 DRM 列表,并构建了不同 BAS 值的列表,同时控制单词含义的知识。结果表明,母语或主导语言中的错误识别率高于第二语言或非主导语言。此外,BAS 调节了 L1 和 L2 中的错误识别。也就是说,在两种语言中,高 BAS 列表的错误识别率都高于低 BAS 列表。信号检测理论的敏感性指数帮助我们进一步深入了解这些结果。根据虚假记忆和第二语言处理文献中的理论模型讨论了主要发现。最后,提供了实际意义和未来研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a1/10174556/eee0455bfee9/pone.0285747.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a1/10174556/eee0455bfee9/pone.0285747.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a1/10174556/eee0455bfee9/pone.0285747.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
False memory in a second language: The importance of controlling the knowledge of word meaning.第二语言中的虚假记忆:控制词汇意义知识的重要性。
PLoS One. 2023 May 11;18(5):e0285747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285747. eCollection 2023.
2
The effect of language proficiency and associative strength on false memory.语言熟练程度和联想强度对错误记忆的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):3134-3151. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01449-3. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
3
The role of associative strength in children's false memory illusions.联想强度在儿童错误记忆错觉中的作用。
Memory. 2009 Jan;17(1):8-16. doi: 10.1080/09658210802438474. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
4
The role of backward associative strength in false recognition of DRM lists with multiple critical words.在 DRM 列表中多个关键单词的错误识别中,反向联想强度的作用。
Psicothema. 2017 Aug;29(3):358-363. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.248.
5
The Role of Language Proficiency in False Memory: A Mini Review.语言能力在错误记忆中的作用:一篇小型综述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 9;12:659434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659434. eCollection 2021.
6
Normative data for Italian Deese/Roediger-McDermott lists.意大利版迪斯/罗迪格-麦克德莫特列表的常模数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):381-9. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0582-3.
7
Reduced false memory in the second language of Turkish-English bilinguals.土耳其语-英语双语者第二语言中错误记忆的减少。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Apr 3:1-9. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2334345.
8
Disentangling the Effects of Backward/Forward Associative Strength and Theme Identifiability in False Memory.在虚假记忆中区分反向/正向联想强度和主题可识别性的影响。
Psicothema. 2023 May;35(2):178-188. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2022.288.
9
What factors underlie associative and categorical memory illusions? The roles of backward associative strength and interitem connectivity.哪些因素导致了联想和范畴记忆错觉?反向联想强度和项目间连接的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jan;38(1):229-39. doi: 10.1037/a0025201. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
10
False memory in between-language conditions: a brief review on the effect of encoding and retrieving in different languages.跨语言条件下的错误记忆:关于不同语言编码与提取效应的简要综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1237471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1237471. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
False memories as a function of language proficiency: Differences between semantic and phonological processing.作为语言熟练度函数的错误记忆:语义加工与语音加工之间的差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02699-1.
2
Bilingual Proficiency Effects on Word Recall and Recognition.双语能力对单词回忆和识别的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;15(4):437. doi: 10.3390/bs15040437.
3
False memory in between-language conditions: a brief review on the effect of encoding and retrieving in different languages.跨语言条件下的错误记忆:关于不同语言编码与提取效应的简要综述

本文引用的文献

1
Disentangling the Effects of Backward/Forward Associative Strength and Theme Identifiability in False Memory.在虚假记忆中区分反向/正向联想强度和主题可识别性的影响。
Psicothema. 2023 May;35(2):178-188. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2022.288.
2
Changes in Native Sentence Processing Related to Bilingualism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与双语相关的母语句子处理变化:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:757023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.757023. eCollection 2022.
3
Fuzzy Lexical Representations in Adult Second Language Speakers.
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1237471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1237471. eCollection 2023.
成年第二语言学习者的模糊词汇表征
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 19;12:732030. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732030. eCollection 2021.
4
Drawing individual images benefits recognition accuracy in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.抽取单个图片有益于德西-罗德里格-麦克德莫特范式中的识别准确性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Aug;75(8):1571-1582. doi: 10.1177/17470218211056498. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
5
False Memories in Native and Foreign Languages.母语和外语中的错误记忆。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 28;12:716336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716336. eCollection 2021.
6
Questioning the Role of Forward Associative Strength in False Memories: Evidence From Deese-Roediger-McDermott Lists With Three Critical Lures.质疑前向联想强度在错误记忆中的作用:来自包含三个关键诱饵的迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特列表的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 13;12:724594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724594. eCollection 2021.
7
Feelings of Contrast at Test Reduce False Memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott Paradigm.测试中的对比感受可减少Deese/Roediger-McDermott范式中的错误记忆。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 13;12:686390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686390. eCollection 2021.
8
The Role of Language Proficiency in False Memory: A Mini Review.语言能力在错误记忆中的作用:一篇小型综述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 9;12:659434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659434. eCollection 2021.
9
The effect of language proficiency and associative strength on false memory.语言熟练程度和联想强度对错误记忆的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):3134-3151. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01449-3. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
10
Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.减少Deese-Roediger/McDermott范式中的错误识别:相关诱饵揭示了独特编码如何改善编码和监测过程。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 20;11:602347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602347. eCollection 2020.