Estes Myka L, McAllister A Kimberley
Center for Neuroscience, UC Davis, Davis, CA.
Brain Pathol. 2014 Nov;24(6):623-30. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12198.
Neuroinflammation was once a clearly defined term denoting pathological immune processes within the central nervous system (CNS). Historically, this term was used to indicate the four hallmarks of peripheral inflammaton that occur following severe CNS injuries, such as stroke, injury or infection. Recently, however, the definition of neuroinflammation has relaxed to the point that it is often now assumed to be present when even only a single classical hallmark of inflammation is measured. As a result, a wide range of disorders, from psychiatric to degenerative diseases, are now assumed to have an integral inflammatory component. Ironically, at the same time, research has revealed unexpected nonclassical immune actions of immune mediators and cells in the CNS in the absence of pathology, increasing the likelihood that homeostatic and adaptive immune processes in the CNS will be mistaken for neuroinflammation. Thus, we suggest reserving the term neuroinflammation for contexts where multiple signs of inflammation are present to avoid erroneously classifying disorders as inflammatory when they may instead be caused by nonimmune etiologies or secondary immune processes that serve adaptive roles.
神经炎症曾是一个定义明确的术语,指中枢神经系统(CNS)内的病理性免疫过程。从历史上看,该术语用于表明严重中枢神经系统损伤(如中风、损伤或感染)后出现的外周炎症的四个特征。然而,最近神经炎症的定义已经放宽到现在甚至仅检测到单一经典炎症特征时就常常假定其存在。结果,现在认为从精神疾病到退行性疾病等广泛的病症都具有不可或缺的炎症成分。具有讽刺意味的是,与此同时,研究揭示了在没有病理情况下中枢神经系统中免疫介质和细胞意外的非经典免疫作用,增加了中枢神经系统中的稳态和适应性免疫过程被误认为是神经炎症的可能性。因此,我们建议仅在存在多种炎症迹象的情况下保留术语神经炎症,以避免在病症可能由非免疫病因或起适应性作用的继发性免疫过程引起时错误地将其归类为炎症性疾病。