Karakale Özge, Nelson Nicole, Gredelj Amina, Ryan Kelly Jayne, Bayindir Anil
School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
School of Psychology, The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27574. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13507-0.
This study examined the influence of social top-down information on eye-gaze behaviour and valence perception in individuals with higher and lower autistic traits. Data from 57 participants (37 identified as female, 18 as male, 2 as non-binary; M = 21.33 years, SD = 4.35) were analysed. Participants rated the valence of facial expressions depicting different intensities of emotions across three contexts while an eye-tracker recorded their gaze behaviour. In the no-context condition, participants observed neutral, joyful and angry faces without any background context; in the positive-context, they viewed neutral and joyful faces while imagining a dream-job offer scenario; and in the negative-context, they viewed neutral and angry faces while imagining a dream-job rejection scenario. Key findings included: (1) both the higher and lower autistic traits groups fixated longer on the eyes than the mouth across valence categories and contexts, with largest differences observed in the no-context condition, (2) the higher autistic traits group showed similar or longer eye fixations than the lower autistic traits group, with greater variability, and (3) the lower autistic traits group exhibited context-sensitive valence ratings, perceiving faces as more negative in positive and negative contexts than in no-context, whereas the higher autistic traits group showed no significant context effects. These results suggest that while both groups integrate prior information in sensory-driven processes like gaze behaviour, context-sensitive reflective judgments are more evident in individuals with lower autistic traits, highlighting trait-linked differences in predictive processing in social cognition.
本研究考察了社会自上而下的信息对具有高、低自闭症特质个体的目光注视行为和效价感知的影响。对57名参与者(37名女性、18名男性、2名非二元性别;平均年龄M = 21.33岁,标准差SD = 4.35)的数据进行了分析。参与者在三种情境下对面部表情所描绘的不同强度情绪的效价进行评分,同时眼动仪记录他们的注视行为。在无情境条件下,参与者观察没有任何背景情境的中性、快乐和愤怒的面孔;在积极情境中,他们在想象获得理想工作机会的场景时观看中性和快乐的面孔;在消极情境中,他们在想象理想工作被拒的场景时观看中性和愤怒的面孔。主要研究结果包括:(1)在所有效价类别和情境中,高、低自闭症特质组对眼睛的注视时间都比对嘴巴的长,在无情境条件下差异最大;(2)高自闭症特质组的注视时间与低自闭症特质组相似或更长,且变异性更大;(3)低自闭症特质组表现出情境敏感的效价评分,在积极和消极情境中比在无情境中认为面孔更消极,而高自闭症特质组没有显著的情境效应。这些结果表明,虽然两组在诸如注视行为等感官驱动过程中都会整合先前信息,但情境敏感的反思性判断在低自闭症特质个体中更为明显,这突出了社会认知中预测性加工方面与特质相关的差异。