Gaibazzi Nicola, Baldari Chiara, Faggiano Pompilio, Albertini Lisa, Faden Giacomo, Pigazzani Filippo, Rossi Cristina, Reverberi Claudio
Cardiology Department, Parma University Hospital, 43123 Parma, Italy.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014 Oct 28;12:43. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-12-43.
BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that a semi-quantitative echocardiographic calcium score (eCS) significantly correlates with cardiac calcium measured by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and, secondarily, severe coronary artery calcifications and stenosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study, conducted in a tertiary centre. eCS was compared with CCTA scores of non-coronary cardiac calcium (nCACS), coronary cardiac calcium (CACS) and number of diseased coronary vessels, in 141 subjects without known coronary artery disease (CAD), who underwent both echocardiography and CCTA for clinical reasons. RESULTS: Age, prevalence of hypertension and all measures of calcium (eCS, nCACS and CACS) differed significantly between the no-CAD and CAD subgroups. eCS was positively correlated with nCACS (Spearman rho = 0.64, p < 0.0001), CACS (rho = 0.46, p < 0.01) and weakly with the number of diseased coronary vessels (rho = 0.28, p < 0.05). eCS and nCACS had similar area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of severe CACS (≥400) (0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.86 and 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.88) or obstructive CAD (0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.72 and 0.63, 95% CI 0.55-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: eCS, a calcium score easily obtainable during standard echocardiography, is moderately to strongly correlated with nCACS by CCTA. The full eCS score correlates with nCACS better than its single components. It correlates with CACS and predicts severe coronary calcification (CACS > 400), a known predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The eCS also predicts obstructive CAD, incrementally to age and clinical variables, although for this purpose CACS remains the most accurate score.
背景:为验证以下假设,即半定量超声心动图钙评分(eCS)与通过冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)测量的心脏钙含量显著相关,其次,与严重冠状动脉钙化和狭窄相关。 方法:这是一项在三级中心进行的回顾性观察性研究。在141例无已知冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的受试者中,将eCS与非冠状动脉心脏钙(nCACS)、冠状动脉心脏钙(CACS)的CCTA评分以及病变冠状动脉血管数量进行比较,这些受试者因临床原因接受了超声心动图和CCTA检查。 结果:无CAD和CAD亚组之间的年龄、高血压患病率以及所有钙测量指标(eCS、nCACS和CACS)存在显著差异。eCS与nCACS(Spearman等级相关系数rho = 0.64,p < 0.0001)、CACS(rho = 0.46,p < 0.01)呈正相关,与病变冠状动脉血管数量呈弱相关(rho = 0.28,p < 0.05)。在预测严重CACS(≥400)(0.77,95%可信区间0.68 - 0.86和0.79,95%可信区间0.72 - 0.88)或阻塞性CAD(0.63,95%可信区间0.54 - 0.72和0.63,95%可信区间0.55 - 0.73)方面,eCS和nCACS的曲线下面积(AUC)相似。 结论:eCS是在标准超声心动图检查期间容易获得的钙评分,与CCTA测量的nCACS呈中度至强相关。完整的eCS评分与nCACS的相关性优于其单个组成部分。它与CACS相关,并可预测严重冠状动脉钙化(CACS > 400),这是心血管发病率和死亡率的已知预测指标。eCS还可预测阻塞性CAD,在年龄和临床变量基础上有增量预测价值,尽管为此目的CACS仍然是最准确的评分。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014-10-28
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015-6
J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2025
Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2023-10-14
Exp Clin Cardiol. 2013
Int J Cardiol. 2013-8-15