Sebastian Alexandra, Jung Patrick, Neuhoff Jonathan, Wibral Michael, Fox Peter T, Lieb Klaus, Fries Pascal, Eickhoff Simon B, Tüscher Oliver, Mobascher Arian
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Brain Imaging Center, MEG Unit, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Apr;221(3):1635-51. doi: 10.1007/s00429-015-0994-y. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
The right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) is frequently activated during executive control tasks. Whereas the function of the dorsal portion of rIFC, more precisely the inferior frontal junction (rIFJ), is convergingly assigned to the attention system, the functional key role of the ventral portion, i.e., the inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), is hitherto controversially debated. Here, we used a two-step methodical approach to clarify the differential function of rIFJ and rIFG. First, we used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a modified stop signal task with an attentional capture condition (acSST) to delineate attentional from inhibitory motor processes (step 1). Then, we applied coordinate-based meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM) to assess functional connectivity profiles of rIFJ and rIFG across various paradigm classes (step 2). As hypothesized, rIFJ activity was associated with the detection of salient stimuli, and was functionally connected to areas of the ventral and dorsal attention network. RIFG was activated during successful response inhibition even when controlling for attentional capture and revealed the highest functional connectivity with core motor areas. Thereby, rIFJ and rIFG delineated largely independent brain networks for attention and motor control. MACM results attributed a more specific attentional function to rIFJ, suggesting an integrative role between stimulus-driven ventral and goal-directed dorsal attention processes. In contrast, rIFG was disclosed as a region of the motor control but not attention system, being essential for response inhibition. The current study provides decisive evidence regarding a more precise functional characterization of rIFC subregions in attention and inhibition.
右下额叶皮质(rIFC)在执行控制任务期间经常被激活。虽然rIFC背侧部分,更确切地说是额下交界区(rIFJ)的功能已趋同地归因于注意力系统,但腹侧部分,即额下回(rIFG)的功能关键作用迄今仍存在争议。在此,我们采用了两步法来阐明rIFJ和rIFG的不同功能。首先,我们在一个带有注意力捕获条件的改良停止信号任务(acSST)中使用事件相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI),以区分注意力过程和抑制性运动过程(步骤1)。然后,我们应用基于坐标的元分析连接建模(MACM)来评估rIFJ和rIFG在各种范式类别中的功能连接概况(步骤2)。正如所假设的,rIFJ的活动与显著刺激的检测相关,并在功能上与腹侧和背侧注意力网络的区域相连。即使在控制了注意力捕获的情况下,rIFG在成功的反应抑制过程中也被激活,并显示出与核心运动区域的最高功能连接。因此,rIFJ和rIFG在很大程度上描绘了用于注意力和运动控制的独立脑网络。MACM结果赋予rIFJ更特定的注意力功能,表明在刺激驱动的腹侧注意力过程和目标导向的背侧注意力过程之间存在整合作用。相比之下,rIFG被揭示为运动控制而非注意力系统的一个区域,对反应抑制至关重要。当前的研究为rIFC亚区域在注意力和抑制方面更精确的功能特征提供了决定性证据。