Suppr超能文献

实践特征能否解释基于电子健康记录的全科医疗注册网络之间发病率估计的差异?

Do practice characteristics explain differences in morbidity estimates between electronic health record based general practice registration networks?

作者信息

van den Dungen C, Hoeymans N, van den Akker M, Biermans M C J, van Boven K, Joosten J H K, Verheij R A, de Waal M W M, Schellevis F G, van Oers J A M

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Oct 30;15:176. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0176-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

General practice based registration networks (GPRNs) provide information on population health derived from electronic health records (EHR). Morbidity estimates from different GPRNs reveal considerable, unexplained differences. Previous research showed that population characteristics could not explain this variation. In this study we investigate the influence of practice characteristics on the variation in incidence and prevalence figures between general practices and between GPRNs.

METHODS

We analyzed the influence of eight practice characteristics, such as type of practice, percentage female general practitioners, and employment of a practice nurse, on the variation in morbidity estimates of twelve diseases between six Dutch GPRNs. We used multilevel logistic regression analysis and expressed the variation between practices and GPRNs in median odds ratios (MOR). Furthermore, we analyzed the influence of type of EHR software package and province within one large national GPRN.

RESULTS

Hardly any practice characteristic showed an effect on morbidity estimates. Adjusting for the practice characteristics did also not alter the variation between practices or between GPRNs, as MORs remained stable. The EHR software package 'Medicom' and the province 'Groningen' showed significant effects on the prevalence figures of several diseases, but this hardly diminished the variation between practices.

CONCLUSION

Practice characteristics do not explain the differences in morbidity estimates between GPRNs.

摘要

背景

基于全科医疗的注册网络(GPRNs)提供源自电子健康记录(EHR)的人群健康信息。不同GPRNs得出的发病率估计值显示出相当大的、无法解释的差异。先前的研究表明人群特征无法解释这种差异。在本研究中,我们调查了医疗机构特征对不同全科医疗机构之间以及不同GPRNs之间发病率和患病率数据差异的影响。

方法

我们分析了八个医疗机构特征的影响,如医疗机构类型、女性全科医生百分比以及是否配备执业护士,对荷兰六个GPRNs之间十二种疾病发病率估计值差异的影响。我们使用多水平逻辑回归分析,并以中位数优势比(MOR)表示不同医疗机构和GPRNs之间的差异。此外,我们在一个大型国家GPRN内分析了EHR软件包类型和省份的影响。

结果

几乎没有任何医疗机构特征对发病率估计值有影响。对医疗机构特征进行调整也未改变不同医疗机构之间或不同GPRNs之间的差异,因为MOR保持稳定。EHR软件包“Medicom”和省份“格罗宁根”对几种疾病的患病率数据有显著影响,但这几乎没有减少不同医疗机构之间的差异。

结论

医疗机构特征无法解释GPRNs之间发病率估计值的差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
A Classification of Disease.疾病分类
J Coll Gen Pract Res Newsl. 1959 May;2(2):140-159.
9
An international glossary for general/family practice. WONCA Classification Committee.
Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;12(3):341-69. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.3.341.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验