Suppr超能文献

结核病筛查价值几何?估算南非、中国和印度结核病主动病例发现的价值。

How much is tuberculosis screening worth? Estimating the value of active case finding for tuberculosis in South Africa, China, and India.

作者信息

Azman Andrew S, Golub Jonathan E, Dowdy David W

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Center for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1550 Orleans St., Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2014 Oct 30;12:216. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0216-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current approaches are unlikely to achieve the aggressive global tuberculosis (TB) control targets set for 2035 and beyond. Active case finding (ACF) may be an important tool for augmenting existing strategies, but the cost-effectiveness of ACF remains uncertain. Program evaluators can often measure the cost of ACF per TB case detected, but how this accessible measure translates into traditional metrics of cost-effectiveness, such as the cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY), remains unclear.

METHODS

We constructed dynamic models of TB in India, China, and South Africa to explore the medium-term impact and cost-effectiveness of generic ACF activities, conceptualized separately as discrete (2-year) campaigns and as continuous activities integrated into ongoing TB control programs. Our primary outcome was the cost per DALY, measured in relationship to the cost per TB case actively detected and started on treatment.

RESULTS

Discrete campaigns costing up to $1,200 (95% uncertainty range [UR] 850-2,043) per case actively detected and started on treatment in India, $3,800 (95% UR 2,706-6,392) in China, and $9,400 (95% UR 6,957-13,221) in South Africa were all highly cost-effective (cost per DALY averted less than per capita gross domestic product). Prolonged integration was even more effective and cost-effective. Short-term assessments of ACF dramatically underestimated potential longer term gains; for example, an assessment of an ACF program at 2 years might find a non-significant 11% reduction in prevalence, but a 10-year evaluation of that same intervention would show a 33% reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

ACF can be a powerful and highly cost-effective tool in the fight against TB. Given that short-term assessments may dramatically underestimate medium-term effectiveness, current willingness to pay may be too low. ACF should receive strong consideration as a basic tool for TB control in most high-burden settings, even when it may cost over $1,000 to detect and initiate treatment for each extra case of active TB.

摘要

背景

当前的方法不太可能实现为2035年及以后设定的积极的全球结核病控制目标。主动病例发现(ACF)可能是加强现有策略的一项重要工具,但ACF的成本效益仍不确定。项目评估人员通常可以衡量每发现一例结核病病例的ACF成本,但这种易于获取的衡量标准如何转化为传统的成本效益指标,如每伤残调整生命年(DALY)的成本,仍不清楚。

方法

我们构建了印度、中国和南非的结核病动态模型,以探讨一般ACF活动的中期影响和成本效益,这些活动分别被概念化为离散的(为期2年的)活动以及纳入正在进行的结核病控制项目的持续活动。我们的主要结果是每DALY的成本,以与每例主动发现并开始治疗的结核病病例的成本相关来衡量。

结果

在印度,每例主动发现并开始治疗的病例花费高达1200美元(95%不确定性范围[UR]850 - 2043美元)的离散活动、在中国花费3800美元(95% UR 2706 - 6392美元)以及在南非花费9400美元(95% UR 6957 - 13221美元)的离散活动都具有很高的成本效益(每避免一个DALY的成本低于人均国内生产总值)。长期整合甚至更有效且更具成本效益。对ACF的短期评估极大地低估了潜在的长期收益;例如,对一个ACF项目在2年时的评估可能发现患病率无显著下降11%,但对同一干预措施进行10年评估时会显示下降33%。

结论

ACF可以成为抗击结核病的有力且极具成本效益的工具。鉴于短期评估可能极大地低估中期效果,当前的支付意愿可能过低。在大多数高负担环境中,ACF应作为结核病控制的基本工具得到充分考虑,即使每发现并启动一例活动性结核病额外病例的治疗可能花费超过1000美元。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/667d/4224697/d9ab2b47157b/12916_2014_216_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验