Sugiyama Michelle Scalise
Department of Anthropology and Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA,
Hum Nat. 2014 Dec;25(4):476-95. doi: 10.1007/s12110-014-9216-1.
Research to date has focused on fitness costs that coalitional aggression imposes on men and how these may have shaped male cognitive design. This study investigated whether warfare may have shaped female cognitive design by identifying fitness costs that lethal raiding imposes on women and determining how widespread these fitness costs are across a sample of forager and forager-horticulturalist societies. To this end, archaeological and ethnographic accounts of lethal raiding were used to generate a list of fitness costs suffered by women in warfare. Five costs were identified: woman killed, woman captured, offspring killed, mate killed/captured, and adult male kin killed/captured. A cross-cultural sample of forager and forager-horticulturalist oral traditions was then surveyed for the presence of these costs. Results suggest that lethal raiding has recurrently imposed fitness costs on women, and that female cognitive design bears reexamination in terms of the motivational and decision-making mechanisms that may have evolved in response to them. This study differs from previous studies of lethal raiding by addressing the lack of comparative research on the fitness costs of warfare for women, by examining a wider range of fitness costs, and by using oral tradition as a database.
迄今为止的研究主要集中在联盟攻击给男性带来的适应性代价,以及这些代价如何塑造了男性的认知结构。本研究通过确定致命性袭击给女性带来的适应性代价,并判断这些适应性代价在觅食者和觅食-园艺者社会样本中的普遍程度,来探究战争是否塑造了女性的认知结构。为此,研究利用了关于致命性袭击的考古学和人种志记录,列出了战争中女性所遭受的适应性代价。研究确定了五种代价:女性被杀、女性被俘虏、后代被杀、配偶被杀/被俘虏、成年男性亲属被杀/被俘虏。随后,研究对觅食者和觅食-园艺者口头传统的跨文化样本进行了调查,以确定这些代价是否存在。结果表明,致命性袭击反复给女性带来适应性代价,而且女性的认知结构在可能因应这些代价而进化的动机和决策机制方面,值得重新审视。本研究与以往关于致命性袭击的研究不同,它弥补了对战争给女性带来的适应性代价缺乏比较研究的不足,考察了更广泛的适应性代价,并将口头传统用作数据库。