• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层小规模社会中的战争模型:群体内部不平等的影响。

A model for warfare in stratified small-scale societies: The effect of within-group inequality.

作者信息

Pandit Sagar, Pradhan Gauri, van Schaik Carel

机构信息

Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.

Anthropological Institute & Museum, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):e0188970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188970. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0188970
PMID:29228014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5724843/
Abstract

In order to predict the features of non-raiding human warfare in small-scale, socially stratified societies, we study a coalitionary model of war that assumes that individuals participate voluntarily because their decisions serve to maximize fitness. Individual males join the coalition if war results in a net economic and thus fitness benefit. Within the model, viable offensive war ensues if the attacking coalition of males can overpower the defending coalition. We assume that the two groups will eventually fuse after a victory, with ranks arranged according to the fighting abilities of all males and that the new group will adopt the winning group's skew in fitness payoffs. We ask whether asymmetries in skew, group size and the amount of resources controlled by a group affect the likelihood of successful war. The model shows, other things being equal, that (i) egalitarian groups are more likely to defeat their more despotic enemies, even when these are stronger, (ii) defection to enemy groups will be rare, unless the attacked group is far more despotic than the attacking one, and (iii) genocidal war is likely under a variety of conditions, in particular when the group under attack is more egalitarian. This simple optimality model accords with several empirically observed correlations in human warfare. Its success underlines the important role of egalitarianism in warfare.

摘要

为了预测小规模、社会分层社会中非掠夺性人类战争的特征,我们研究了一种战争联盟模型,该模型假设个体自愿参与,因为他们的决策旨在使适应性最大化。如果战争能带来净经济收益从而带来适应性益处,个体男性就会加入联盟。在模型中,如果男性攻击联盟能够击败防御联盟,就会引发可行的进攻性战争。我们假设两组最终会在胜利后融合,根据所有男性的战斗能力排列等级,并且新群体将采用获胜群体在适应性收益方面的倾斜度。我们询问倾斜度、群体规模和群体控制的资源量方面的不对称性是否会影响成功战争的可能性。该模型表明,在其他条件相同的情况下,(i)平等主义群体更有可能击败其更专制的敌人,即使这些敌人更强大;(ii)叛逃到敌对阵营的情况很少见,除非被攻击群体比攻击群体专制得多;(iii)种族灭绝战争在各种情况下都有可能发生,特别是当被攻击群体更加平等主义时。这个简单的最优性模型与人类战争中一些实证观察到的相关性相符。它取得的成功凸显了平等主义在战争中的重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/5cc573cc90db/pone.0188970.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/e1de510e3115/pone.0188970.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/2e6e67c3f366/pone.0188970.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/a7a910592182/pone.0188970.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/2be4ebbebbc9/pone.0188970.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/8651571e1005/pone.0188970.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/2c6860a252d8/pone.0188970.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/5cc573cc90db/pone.0188970.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/e1de510e3115/pone.0188970.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/2e6e67c3f366/pone.0188970.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/a7a910592182/pone.0188970.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/2be4ebbebbc9/pone.0188970.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/8651571e1005/pone.0188970.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/2c6860a252d8/pone.0188970.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d7/5724843/5cc573cc90db/pone.0188970.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A model for warfare in stratified small-scale societies: The effect of within-group inequality.分层小规模社会中的战争模型:群体内部不平等的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):e0188970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188970. eCollection 2017.
2
Bands of brothers and in-laws: Waorani warfare, marriage and alliance formation.兄弟和姻亲的纽带:瓦劳尼人的战争、婚姻和联盟形成。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 31;285(1890):20181859. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1859.
3
Self-organization and natural selection in the evolution of complex despotic societies.复杂专制社会演化中的自组织与自然选择
Biol Bull. 2002 Jun;202(3):283-8. doi: 10.2307/1543480.
4
War and the evolution of belligerence and bravery.战争与好战性和勇敢精神的演变。
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 22;275(1653):2877-85. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0842.
5
The Conditions Favoring Between-Community Raiding in Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and Human Foragers.黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩和人类觅食者群体间袭击行为的有利条件。
Hum Nat. 2016 Jun;27(2):141-59. doi: 10.1007/s12110-015-9252-5.
6
Why war is a man's game.为什么战争是男人的游戏。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 15;285(1884):20180975. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0975.
7
Fitness costs of warfare for women.女性战争的适应性代价。
Hum Nat. 2014 Dec;25(4):476-95. doi: 10.1007/s12110-014-9216-1.
8
Why do chimpanzee males attack the females of neighboring communities?为什么黑猩猩雄性会攻击邻近群落的雌性?
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Nov;155(3):430-5. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22589. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
9
Lethal aggression in mobile forager bands and implications for the origins of war.游牧采集者群体中的致命攻击行为及其对战争起源的影响。
Science. 2013 Jul 19;341(6143):270-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1235675.
10
The enemy as animal: Symmetric dehumanization during asymmetric warfare.作为动物的敌人:非对称战争中的对称去人性化
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 26;12(7):e0181422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181422. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
The proximate regulation of prosocial behaviour: towards a conceptual framework for comparative research.亲社会行为的近因调控:走向比较研究的概念框架。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 2;27(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01846-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Men's status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy.33个非工业社会中男性的地位与生殖成功率:生存方式、婚姻制度及生殖策略的影响
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 27;113(39):10824-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606800113. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
2
The evolution of inequality.不平等的演变。
Evol Anthropol. 2016 Jul;25(4):184-99. doi: 10.1002/evan.21491.
3
The Conditions Favoring Between-Community Raiding in Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and Human Foragers.黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩和人类觅食者群体间袭击行为的有利条件。
Hum Nat. 2016 Jun;27(2):141-59. doi: 10.1007/s12110-015-9252-5.
4
Communal range defence in primates as a public goods dilemma.灵长类动物的群体范围防御作为一种公共物品困境。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 5;370(1683):20150003. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0003.
5
The massacre mass grave of Schöneck-Kilianstädten reveals new insights into collective violence in Early Neolithic Central Europe.舍内克-基利安施塔滕的大屠杀乱葬岗揭示了对新石器时代早期中欧集体暴力的新见解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 8;112(36):11217-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504365112. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
6
Proving communal warfare among hunter-gatherers: The Quasi-Rousseauan error.证明狩猎采集者之间的群体冲突:准卢梭式错误。
Evol Anthropol. 2015 May-Jun;24(3):111-26. doi: 10.1002/evan.21446.
7
An evolutionary theory of large-scale human warfare: Group-structured cultural selection.大规模人类战争的进化理论:群体结构化文化选择
Evol Anthropol. 2015 Mar-Apr;24(2):50-61. doi: 10.1002/evan.21439.
8
Warfare and reproductive success in a tribal population.部落人群中的战争与生殖成功
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 13;112(2):348-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412287112. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
9
Lethal aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts.人类活动的影响不如适应策略更能解释黑豹的致命攻击行为。
Nature. 2014 Sep 18;513(7518):414-7. doi: 10.1038/nature13727.
10
Why do chimpanzee males attack the females of neighboring communities?为什么黑猩猩雄性会攻击邻近群落的雌性?
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Nov;155(3):430-5. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22589. Epub 2014 Aug 6.