Roncato Sergio
Dipartimento Psicologia Generale, Università Padova Padova, Italy.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Oct 20;8:841. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00841. eCollection 2014.
Visual contours often result from the integration or interpolation of fragmented edges. The strength of the completion increases when the edges share the same contrast polarity (CP). Here we demonstrate that the appearance in the perceptual field of this integrated unit, or contour of invariant CP, is concomitant with a vivid brightness alteration of the surfaces at its opposite sides. To observe this effect requires some stratagems because the formation in the visual field of a contour of invariant CP normally engenders the formation of a second contour and then the rise of two streams of induction signals that interfere in different ways. Particular configurations have been introduced that allow us to observe the induction effects of one contour taken in isolation. I documented these effects by phenomenological observations and psychophysical measurement of the brightness alteration in relation to luminance contrast. When the edges of the same CP complete to form a contour, the background of homogeneous luminance appears to dim at one side and to brighten at the opposite side (in accord with the CP). The strength of the phenomenon is proportional to the local luminance contrast. This effect weakens or nulls when the contour of the invariant CP separates surfaces filled with different gray shades. These conflicting results stimulate a deeper exploration of the induction phenomena and their role in the computation of brightness contrast. An alternative perspective is offered to account for some brightness illusions and their relation to the phenomenal transparency. The main assumption asserts that, when in the same region induction signals of opposite CP overlap, the filling-in is blocked unless the image is stratified into different layers, one for each signal of the same polarity. Phenomenological observations document this "solution" by the visual system.
视觉轮廓通常源于碎片化边缘的整合或插值。当边缘具有相同的对比度极性(CP)时,这种整合的强度会增加。在这里,我们证明了这个整合单元在感知场中的出现,即具有不变CP的轮廓,与它相对两侧表面的明显亮度变化相伴而生。要观察到这种效应需要一些策略,因为在视野中形成具有不变CP的轮廓通常会导致形成第二个轮廓,进而产生两束以不同方式相互干扰的诱导信号。我们引入了特殊的配置,以便能够单独观察一个轮廓的诱导效应。我通过现象学观察以及与亮度对比度相关的亮度变化的心理物理学测量记录了这些效应。当具有相同CP的边缘整合形成一个轮廓时,均匀亮度的背景在一侧似乎变暗,而在另一侧似乎变亮(与CP一致)。这种现象的强度与局部亮度对比度成正比。当具有不变CP的轮廓分隔填充有不同灰度的表面时,这种效应会减弱或消失。这些相互矛盾的结果促使我们对诱导现象及其在亮度对比度计算中的作用进行更深入的探索。我们提供了另一种视角来解释一些亮度错觉及其与现象透明度的关系。主要假设是,当在同一区域中具有相反CP的诱导信号重叠时,除非图像被分层为不同的层,每个相同极性的信号对应一层,否则填充过程会被阻止。现象学观察记录了视觉系统的这种“解决方案”。