Sutfin Erin L, Swords Darden C, Song Eun-Young, Reboussin Beth A, Helme Donald, Klein Elizabeth, Wolfson Mark
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(1):e41-9. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130820-QUAN-436. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
To assess tobacco screening and counseling in student health clinics, including facilitators, barriers, and associations with campus- and state-level variables.
We conducted a mixed-methods study with an online survey and qualitative interviews.
Study setting was student health clinics on college campuses.
Subjects included 71 clinic directors or designees from 10 Southeastern states (quantitative survey) and 8 directors or designees from 4 Southeastern states (qualitative interviews).
Quantitative measures included demographics, screening and counseling practices, clinic-level supports for such practices, perceptions of tobacco on campus, institution size, public/private status, state tobacco farming revenue, and state tobacco control funding. Qualitative measures included barriers and facilitators of tobacco screening and counseling practices.
Logistic and linear regression models assessed correlates of screening and counseling. Qualitative data were analyzed using multistage interpretive thematic analysis.
A total of 55% of online survey respondents reported that their clinics screen for tobacco at every visit, whereas 80% reported their clinics offer counseling and pharmacotherapy. Barriers included lack of the following: time with patients, relevance to chief complaint, student self-identification as a tobacco user, access to pharmacotherapy, and interest in quitting among smokers. In multivariable models, more efforts to reduce tobacco use, student enrollment, and state-level cash receipts for tobacco were positively associated with clinic-level supports.
This study highlights missed opportunities for screening. Although reports of counseling were higher, providers identified many barriers.
评估学生健康诊所的烟草筛查与咨询情况,包括促进因素、障碍以及与校园和州层面变量的关联。
我们开展了一项混合方法研究,采用在线调查和定性访谈。
研究地点为大学校园里的学生健康诊所。
对象包括来自东南部10个州的71名诊所主任或指定人员(定量调查)以及来自东南部4个州的8名主任或指定人员(定性访谈)。
定量测量包括人口统计学、筛查与咨询实践、诊所对这些实践的支持、对校园烟草的认知、机构规模、公立/私立状态、州烟草种植收入以及州烟草控制资金。定性测量包括烟草筛查与咨询实践的障碍和促进因素。
逻辑回归和线性回归模型评估筛查与咨询的相关因素。定性数据采用多阶段解释性主题分析。
共有55%的在线调查受访者表示他们的诊所每次就诊时都会进行烟草筛查,而80%的受访者表示他们的诊所提供咨询和药物治疗。障碍包括缺乏以下方面:与患者相处的时间、与主要诉求的相关性、学生自我认定为烟草使用者、获得药物治疗的机会以及吸烟者戒烟的意愿。在多变量模型中,更多减少烟草使用的努力、学生入学人数以及州级烟草现金收入与诊所层面的支持呈正相关。
本研究突出了筛查方面错失的机会。尽管咨询报告的比例较高,但提供者指出了许多障碍。