• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在推特上与卫生机构互动。

Engagement with health agencies on twitter.

作者信息

Bhattacharya Sanmitra, Srinivasan Padmini, Polgreen Phil

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.

Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Nov 7;9(11):e112235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112235. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0112235
PMID:25379727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4224440/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors associated with engagement of U.S. Federal Health Agencies via Twitter. Our specific goals are to study factors related to a) numbers of retweets, b) time between the agency tweet and first retweet and c) time between the agency tweet and last retweet.

METHODS

We collect 164,104 tweets from 25 Federal Health Agencies and their 130 accounts. We use negative binomial hurdle regression models and Cox proportional hazards models to explore the influence of 26 factors on agency engagement. Account features include network centrality, tweet count, numbers of friends, followers, and favorites. Tweet features include age, the use of hashtags, user-mentions, URLs, sentiment measured using Sentistrength, and tweet content represented by fifteen semantic groups.

RESULTS

A third of the tweets (53,556) had zero retweets. Less than 1% (613) had more than 100 retweets (mean  = 284). The hurdle analysis shows that hashtags, URLs and user-mentions are positively associated with retweets; sentiment has no association with retweets; and tweet count has a negative association with retweets. Almost all semantic groups, except for geographic areas, occupations and organizations, are positively associated with retweeting. The survival analyses indicate that engagement is positively associated with tweet age and the follower count.

CONCLUSIONS

Some of the factors associated with higher levels of Twitter engagement cannot be changed by the agencies, but others can be modified (e.g., use of hashtags, URLs). Our findings provide the background for future controlled experiments to increase public health engagement via Twitter.

摘要

目的

调查美国联邦卫生机构通过推特进行互动的相关因素。我们的具体目标是研究与以下方面相关的因素:a)转发数;b)机构推文与首次转发之间的时间间隔;c)机构推文与最后一次转发之间的时间间隔。

方法

我们收集了来自25个联邦卫生机构及其130个账户的164,104条推文。我们使用负二项式障碍回归模型和Cox比例风险模型来探究26个因素对机构互动的影响。账户特征包括网络中心性、推文数量、好友数、关注者数和收藏数。推文特征包括发布时长、主题标签的使用、用户提及、网址、使用Sentistrength测量的情感倾向,以及由十五个语义组表示的推文内容。

结果

三分之一的推文(53,556条)没有转发。不到1%(613条)的推文转发数超过100次(平均转发数 = 284次)。障碍分析表明,主题标签、网址和用户提及与转发呈正相关;情感倾向与转发无关;推文数量与转发呈负相关。除地理区域、职业和组织外,几乎所有语义组都与转发呈正相关。生存分析表明,互动与推文发布时长和关注者数量呈正相关。

结论

一些与推特较高互动水平相关的因素机构无法改变,但其他因素可以修改(例如,主题标签、网址的使用)。我们的研究结果为未来通过推特提高公众健康参与度的对照实验提供了背景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df21/4224440/3ade675f5c6f/pone.0112235.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df21/4224440/3a1d93d5d851/pone.0112235.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df21/4224440/3ade675f5c6f/pone.0112235.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df21/4224440/3a1d93d5d851/pone.0112235.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df21/4224440/3ade675f5c6f/pone.0112235.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Engagement with health agencies on twitter.在推特上与卫生机构互动。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 7;9(11):e112235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112235. eCollection 2014.
2
Examining Tweet Content and Engagement of Canadian Public Health Agencies and Decision Makers During COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis.研究 COVID-19 期间加拿大公共卫生机构和决策者的推文内容和参与度:混合方法分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 11;23(3):e24883. doi: 10.2196/24883.
3
Understanding the Composition of a Successful Tweet in Urology.理解泌尿外科成功推特点的构成要素。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):450-457. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
4
#Radiology: A 7-Year Analysis of Radiology-Associated Hashtags.放射学:对与放射学相关主题标签的7年分析。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018 Sep;47(5):296-301. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
5
An Academic Healthcare Twitter Account: The Mayo Clinic Experience.一个学术性医疗保健领域的推特账号:梅奥诊所的经验
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Jun;19(6):360-6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0607.
6
The Spread of COVID-19 Crisis Communication by German Public Authorities and Experts on Twitter: Quantitative Content Analysis.德国公共当局和专家在 Twitter 上传播 COVID-19 危机信息:定量内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 22;7(12):e31834. doi: 10.2196/31834.
7
Educational content and the use of social media at US departments of surgery.美国外科学系的教育内容和社交媒体的使用。
Surgery. 2018 Feb;163(2):467-471. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.039. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
8
Advocating for Older Adults in the Age of Social Media: Strategies to Achieve Peak Engagement on Twitter.倡导社交媒体时代的老年人权益:在 Twitter 上实现最佳参与度的策略。
JMIR Aging. 2024 May 1;7:e49608. doi: 10.2196/49608.
9
Tweeting as Health Communication: Health Organizations' Use of Twitter for Health Promotion and Public Engagement.作为健康传播的推文:健康组织利用推特进行健康促进和公众参与。
J Health Commun. 2016;21(2):188-98. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1058435. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
10
I Tweet, Therefore I Learn: An Analysis of Twitter Use Across Anesthesiology Conferences.我发推文,所以我学习:对麻醉学会议中 Twitter 使用情况的分析。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):333-340. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004036.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting Public Engagement in Palliative and End-of-Life Care Discussions on Chinese Social Media: Model Development and Analysis.促进中国社交媒体上公众参与姑息治疗和临终关怀讨论:模式开发与分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 18;27:e59944. doi: 10.2196/59944.
2
Attention-Seeking Strategies: An Investigation of Sexual Assault Organizations' Communication Tactics on Twitter.寻求关注策略:对性侵犯组织在推特上的沟通策略的调查。
Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2025 Apr;54(2):378-410. doi: 10.1177/08997640241247025. Epub 2024 May 18.
3
Advocating for Older Adults in the Age of Social Media: Strategies to Achieve Peak Engagement on Twitter.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards Large-scale Twitter Mining for Drug-related Adverse Events.迈向用于药物相关不良事件的大规模推特挖掘
SHB12 (2012). 2012 Oct 29;2012:25-32. doi: 10.1145/2389707.2389713.
2
Use of twitter among local health departments: an analysis of information sharing, engagement, and action.地方卫生部门对推特的使用:信息共享、参与度及行动分析
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 19;15(8):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2775.
3
Evaluating social media's capacity to develop engaged audiences in health promotion settings: use of Twitter metrics as a case study.
倡导社交媒体时代的老年人权益:在 Twitter 上实现最佳参与度的策略。
JMIR Aging. 2024 May 1;7:e49608. doi: 10.2196/49608.
4
Examining Public Messaging on Influenza Vaccine over Social Media: Unsupervised Deep Learning of 235,261 Twitter Posts from 2017 to 2023.审视社交媒体上关于流感疫苗的公众信息:对2017年至2023年235,261条推特帖子进行无监督深度学习
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Sep 24;11(10):1518. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11101518.
5
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Communication for Public Health: Systematic Review.评估基于互联网的公共卫生通讯的有效性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 13;24(9):e38541. doi: 10.2196/38541.
6
Going rogue: what scientists can learn about Twitter communication from "alt" government accounts.行为越界:科学家能从“另类”政府账户中学到关于推特交流的什么
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 2;9:e12407. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12407. eCollection 2021.
7
How do sentiments affect virality on Twitter?情绪如何影响推特上的传播性?
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Apr 14;8(4):201756. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201756.
8
Texas Public Agencies' Tweets and Public Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Natural Language Processing Approach.德克萨斯州公共机构在 COVID-19 大流行期间的推文和公众参与:自然语言处理方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 26;7(4):e26720. doi: 10.2196/26720.
9
Examining Tweet Content and Engagement of Canadian Public Health Agencies and Decision Makers During COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis.研究 COVID-19 期间加拿大公共卫生机构和决策者的推文内容和参与度:混合方法分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 11;23(3):e24883. doi: 10.2196/24883.
10
Use of #SaludTues Tweetchats for the Dissemination of Culturally Relevant Information on Latino Health Equity: Exploratory Case Study.使用#SaludTues Tweetchats 传播关于拉丁裔健康公平的文化相关信息:探索性案例研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Mar 1;7(3):e21266. doi: 10.2196/21266.
评估社交媒体在健康促进环境中培养积极参与受众的能力:以推特指标为例进行研究。
Health Promot Pract. 2013 Mar;14(2):157-62. doi: 10.1177/1524839912469378. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
4
Adoption and use of social media among public health departments.公共卫生部门对社交媒体的采用和使用。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 26;12:242. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-242.
5
Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: hedonometrics and Twitter.全球社交网络中的快乐和信息的时间模式:快乐计量学和 Twitter。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e26752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026752. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
6
Zero-inflated and hurdle models of count data with extra zeros: examples from an HIV-risk reduction intervention trial.带有额外零值的计数数据的零膨胀和障碍模型:来自 HIV 风险降低干预试验的实例。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2011 Sep;37(5):367-75. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2011.597280.
7
MeSH: a window into full text for document summarization.MeSH:全文检索的窗口,用于文档摘要。
Bioinformatics. 2011 Jul 1;27(13):i120-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr223.
8
The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic.利用 Twitter 追踪美国甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间的疾病活动和公众关注水平。
PLoS One. 2011 May 4;6(5):e19467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019467.
9
'What's happening?' A content analysis of concussion-related traffic on Twitter.'发生了什么?' 对 Twitter 上与脑震荡相关的交通内容的分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;46(4):258-63. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080341. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
10
Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak.推特时代的大流行疫情:2009 年 H1N1 爆发期间推文的内容分析。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e14118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014118.