• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型公共部门医疗保健机构长期病假管理:一项采用混合方法的现实主义评价

The Management of Long-Term Sickness Absence in Large Public Sector Healthcare Organisations: A Realist Evaluation Using Mixed Methods.

作者信息

Higgins Angela, O'Halloran Peter, Porter Sam

机构信息

Occupational Health, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim Hospital, Antrim, BT41 2RL, Northern Ireland, UK,

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Sep;25(3):451-70. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9553-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-014-9553-2
PMID:25385199
Abstract

PURPOSE

The success of measures to reduce long-term sickness absence (LTSA) in public sector organisations is contingent on organisational context. This realist evaluation investigates how interventions interact with context to influence successful management of LTSA.

METHODS

Multi-method case study in three Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland comprising realist literature review, semi-structured interviews (61 participants), Process-Mapping and feedback meetings (59 participants), observation of training, analysis of documents.

RESULTS

Important activities included early intervention; workplace-based occupational rehabilitation; robust sickness absence policies with clear trigger points for action. Used appropriately, in a context of good interpersonal and interdepartmental communication and shared goals, these are able to increase the motivation of staff to return to work. Line managers are encouraged to take a proactive approach when senior managers provide support and accountability. Hindering factors: delayed intervention; inconsistent implementation of policy and procedure; lack of resources; organisational complexity; stakeholders misunderstanding each other's goals and motives.

CONCLUSIONS

Different mechanisms have the potential to encourage common motivations for earlier return from LTSA, such as employees feeling that they have the support of their line manager to return to work and having the confidence to do so. Line managers' proactively engage when they have confidence in the support of seniors and in their own ability to address LTSA. Fostering these motivations calls for a thoughtful, diagnostic process, taking into account the contextual factors (and whether they can be modified) and considering how a given intervention can be used to trigger the appropriate mechanisms.

摘要

目的

公共部门组织中减少长期病假(LTSA)措施的成功与否取决于组织背景。这项现实主义评估研究了干预措施如何与背景相互作用,以影响LTSA的成功管理。

方法

在北爱尔兰的三个卫生和社会护理信托基金中进行多方法案例研究,包括现实主义文献综述、半结构化访谈(61名参与者)、流程映射和反馈会议(59名参与者)、培训观察、文件分析。

结果

重要活动包括早期干预;基于工作场所的职业康复;具有明确行动触发点的强有力的病假政策。在良好的人际和部门间沟通以及共同目标的背景下适当使用这些措施,能够提高员工重返工作岗位的积极性。当高级管理人员提供支持和问责时,鼓励直线经理采取积极主动的方法。阻碍因素包括:干预延迟;政策和程序执行不一致;资源缺乏;组织复杂性;利益相关者相互误解彼此的目标和动机。

结论

不同的机制有可能激发促使员工更早从长期病假中返回工作岗位的共同动机,比如员工感到他们得到直线经理的支持并对重返工作有信心。当直线经理对上级的支持以及自己解决长期病假问题的能力有信心时,他们会积极参与。培养这些动机需要一个深思熟虑的诊断过程,要考虑到背景因素(以及它们是否可以改变),并思考如何利用特定的干预措施来触发适当的机制。

相似文献

1
The Management of Long-Term Sickness Absence in Large Public Sector Healthcare Organisations: A Realist Evaluation Using Mixed Methods.大型公共部门医疗保健机构长期病假管理:一项采用混合方法的现实主义评价
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Sep;25(3):451-70. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9553-2.
2
3
What happens to work if you're unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting.如果您身体不适,工作会发生什么变化?在公共部门环境中,患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的经理和员工的信念和态度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Mar;21(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9251-7.
4
Management of long term sickness absence: a systematic realist review.长期病假管理:系统的现实主义综述。
J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Sep;22(3):322-32. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9362-4.
5
Exploring line managers' perspectives on using data in managing sickness absence: a qualitative study.探讨直线经理在管理病假时使用数据的观点:一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Sep 17;22(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01224-5.
6
The social interaction of return to work explored from co-workers experiences.从同事的经历探讨重返工作的社会互动。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21-22):1979-89. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.553708. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
7
Stakeholder influence in public sector information systems strategy implementation-The case of public hospitals in South Africa.利益相关者对公共部门信息系统战略实施的影响——以南非公立医院为例。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jan;109:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
General practitioners' management of the long-term sick role.全科医生对长期病患者角色的管理。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;107:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.044. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
9
Does transfer of work from a public sector organisation to a commercial enterprise without staff reductions increase risk of long-term sickness absence among the staff? A cohort study of laboratory and radiology employees.从公共部门组织向商业企业转移工作而不裁员是否会增加员工长期病假的风险?对实验室和放射科员工的队列研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2013 Aug;70(8):585-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2012-101174. Epub 2013 May 8.
10
Involvement and structure: a qualitative study of organizational change and sickness absence among women in the public sector in Sweden.参与和结构:瑞典公共部门女性组织变革和病假的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 16;11:318. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-318.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic realist synthesis of digital interventions for enhancing mental health at work: contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes.一项关于数字干预措施以促进工作场所心理健康的系统现实主义综合研究:背景、机制和结果。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2025 Jan 9;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00655-5.
2
"I'm pulling through because of you": injured workers' perspective of workplace factors supporting return to work under the Saskatchewan Workers' Compensation Board scheme.“因为你,我才挺过来”:工伤员工对萨斯喀彻温省工人赔偿委员会计划下支持重返工作岗位的工作场所因素的看法。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Mar 15;5:1373888. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1373888. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
General practitioners' management of the long-term sick role.全科医生对长期病患者角色的管理。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;107:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.044. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
2
Management of long term sickness absence: a systematic realist review.长期病假管理:系统的现实主义综述。
J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Sep;22(3):322-32. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9362-4.
3
The use and limitation of realistic evaluation as a tool for evidence-based practice: a critical realist perspective.真实评价作为循证实践工具的使用和限制:批判实在论视角。
A systematic review defining non-beneficial and inappropriate end-of-life treatment in patients with non-cancer diagnoses: theoretical development for multi-stakeholder intervention design in acute care settings.
系统评价定义非癌症诊断患者无益和不适当的临终治疗:急性护理环境中多利益相关者干预设计的理论发展。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Nov 9;21(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01071-7.
4
"Transition from children's to adult services for adolescents/young adults with life-limiting conditions: developing realist programme theory through an international comparison".“患有危及生命疾病的青少年/青年从儿童服务向成人服务的过渡:通过国际比较制定现实的方案理论”。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 30;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00620-2.
5
Defining and assessing context in healthcare implementation studies: a systematic review.定义和评估医疗保健实施研究中的背景:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05212-7.
6
The usefulness and acceptability of a personal health record to children and young people living with a complex health condition: A realist review of the literature.个人健康记录对患有复杂健康状况的儿童和年轻人的有用性和可接受性:文献的现实主义综述
Child Care Health Dev. 2019 May;45(3):313-332. doi: 10.1111/cch.12652. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
7
Advance Care Planning With Patients Who Have End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Realist Review.终末期肾病患者的预先医疗照护计划:系统现实主义综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Nov;56(5):795-807.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
Nurs Inq. 2012 Mar;19(1):18-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00551.x. Epub 2011 Jul 10.
4
Assembling the evidence jigsaw: insights from a systematic review of UK studies of individual-focused return to work initiatives for disabled and long-term ill people.组装证据拼图:来自英国针对残疾和长期患病者个体为中心的重返工作倡议的系统评价研究的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Mar 21;11:170. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-170.
5
NICE guidance on long-term sickness and incapacity.NICE 关于长期疾病和丧失工作能力的指导意见。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Mar;61(584):e118-24. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X561221.
6
What happens to work if you're unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting.如果您身体不适,工作会发生什么变化?在公共部门环境中,患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的经理和员工的信念和态度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Mar;21(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9251-7.
7
A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care.现实评估:基于方案的护理案例。
Implement Sci. 2010 May 26;5:38. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-38.
8
Protocolized versus non-protocolized weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients.采用标准化与非标准化撤机方案以缩短危重症成年患者机械通气时间
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006904. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006904.pub2.
9
Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury.关于受伤后重返工作岗位的定性文献的系统综述。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006 Aug;32(4):257-69.
10
Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team.职业康复中的组织间合作:跨学科康复团队的认知
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Dec;15(4):581-90. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8036-x.