Maatz Anke, Hoff Paul
University Hospital of Psychiatry, Zurich
University Hospital of Psychiatry, Zurich.
Hist Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;25(4):431-40. doi: 10.1177/0957154X14546606.
After Eugen Bleuler introduced 'schizophrenia' in 1908, the term was hotly debated but eventually led to the abandonment of Kraepelin's previous term 'dementia praecox'. Bleuler's contribution has subsequently been interpreted in two main ways. One tradition holds that Bleuler merely renamed 'dementia praecox' while conceptually continuing the Kraepelinian tradition. The other, focusing on Bleuler's characterization of 'dementia praecox' in terms of specific psychological alterations, accredits him with a genuine re-conceptualization. Based on a close reading of 'Die Prognose der Dementia praecox', the paper in which Bleuler first mentioned 'schizophrenia', we suggest a further interpretation of Bleuler's contribution and argue that the main motive for his re-conceptualization is to be found in his rejection of Kraepelinian nosology.
1908年尤金·布鲁勒引入“精神分裂症”一词后,该术语引发了激烈辩论,但最终导致放弃了克雷佩林之前的术语“早发性痴呆”。布鲁勒的贡献随后主要有两种解读方式。一种传统观点认为,布鲁勒只是给“早发性痴呆”重新命名,而在概念上延续了克雷佩林学派的传统。另一种观点则侧重于布鲁勒从特定心理改变方面对“早发性痴呆”的描述,认为他实现了真正的重新概念化。基于对布鲁勒首次提及“精神分裂症”的论文《早发性痴呆的预后》的仔细研读,我们对布鲁勒的贡献提出了另一种解读,并认为他重新概念化的主要动机在于他对克雷佩林分类学的摒弃。