Kröger Christoph, Bode Katharina, Wunsch Eva-Maria, Kliem Sören, Grocholewski Anja, Finger Friederike
Department of Psychology, Technical University Brunswick.
Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2015 Apr;20(2):248-58. doi: 10.1037/a0038341. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of work-related cognitive-behavioral treatment (W-CBT) with that of cognitive-behavioral treatment as usual (CBT-AU) for employees on sick leave as a result of a major depressive disorder (MDD). We collected data for 26 matched outpatients at pre- and posttreatment, as well as at 1-year follow-up. Outcome measures were the days of incapacity to work (DIW) as well as self-report measures (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI], Symptom Checklist 90-R [GSI], Life Satisfaction Questionnaire [FLZ]). We analyzed data with hierarchical linear modeling in a 2-level model. Therapy effects were defined in 3 ways: effect size (ES), response (based on the reliable change index), and remission compared with the general population's symptom level. The DIW were reduced significantly after both types of treatment, but employees showed even fewer DIW after W-CBT. At follow-up, significantly more employees were working as a result of W-CBT than with CBT-AU. Significant improvements on scores of self-rating measures corresponded with moderate-to-large effect sizes for both treatment types. Approximately 2 thirds of the treated employees were categorized as unimpaired on BDI scores at posttreatment and at follow-up. At least 1 half of the employees were classified as unimpaired on GSI scores at both assessment points. In future research, a randomized controlled trial should be conducted using a larger sample size to investigate the impact of moderators (e.g., employees at different branches of the company). Findings provided support for using common CBT techniques to enhance return to work without losing expected improvements at the symptom level.
本研究的目的是比较工作相关认知行为疗法(W-CBT)与常规认知行为疗法(CBT-AU)对因重度抑郁症(MDD)而休病假的员工的疗效。我们收集了26名匹配的门诊患者在治疗前、治疗后以及1年随访时的数据。结果指标包括无法工作的天数(DIW)以及自我报告指标(贝克抑郁量表[BDI]、症状自评量表90-R[GSI]、生活满意度问卷[FLZ])。我们在一个两级模型中使用分层线性模型分析数据。治疗效果通过三种方式定义:效应大小(ES)、反应(基于可靠变化指数)以及与一般人群症状水平相比的缓解情况。两种治疗后DIW均显著减少,但W-CBT后员工的DIW更少。在随访时,接受W-CBT治疗后继续工作的员工显著多于接受CBT-AU治疗的员工。两种治疗类型的自我评定指标得分均有显著改善,对应中等至较大的效应大小。在治疗后和随访时,约三分之二接受治疗的员工BDI得分被归类为未受损。在两个评估点,至少一半的员工GSI得分被归类为未受损。在未来的研究中,应进行一项随机对照试验,使用更大的样本量来研究调节因素(例如,公司不同部门的员工)的影响。研究结果支持使用常见的CBT技术来促进员工重返工作岗位,同时在症状水平上不失去预期的改善效果。