Suppr超能文献

在重症监护病房实施“唤醒与呼吸”方案对镇静和谵妄的效果。

Effectiveness of implementing a wake up and breathe program on sedation and delirium in the ICU.

作者信息

Khan Babar A, Fadel William F, Tricker Jason L, Carlos W Graham, Farber Mark O, Hui Siu L, Campbell Noll L, Ely E Wesley, Boustani Malaz A

机构信息

1Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care/Allergy and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 2Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN. 3Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN. 4Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 5Wishard Health Services, Indianapolis, IN. 6Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN. 7Division of Allergy/Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN. 8VA Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):e791-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000660.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Mechanically ventilated critically ill patients receive significant amounts of sedatives and analgesics that increase their risk of developing coma and delirium. We evaluated the impact of a "Wake-up and Breathe Protocol" at our local ICU on sedation and delirium.

DESIGN

A pre/post implementation study design.

SETTING

A 22-bed mixed surgical and medical ICU.

PATIENTS

Seven hundred two consecutive mechanically ventilated ICU patients from June 2010 to January 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

Implementation of daily paired spontaneous awakening trials (daily sedation vacation plus spontaneous breathing trials) as a quality improvement project.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After implementation of our program, there was an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekdays of 0.88 (p < 0.0001) and an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekends of 1.21 (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, race, gender, severity of illness, primary diagnosis, and ICU, the incidence and prevalence of delirium did not change post implementation of the protocol (incidence: 23% pre vs 19.6% post; p = 0.40; prevalence: 66.7% pre vs 55.3% post; p = 0.06). The combined prevalence of delirium/coma decreased from 90.8% pre protocol implementation to 85% postimplementation (odds ratio, 0.505; 95% CI, 0.299-0.853; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing a "Wake Up and Breathe Program" resulted in reduced sedation among critically ill mechanically ventilated patients but did not change the incidence or prevalence of delirium.

摘要

目的

接受机械通气的重症患者会使用大量镇静剂和镇痛药,这增加了他们发生昏迷和谵妄的风险。我们评估了本地重症监护病房(ICU)实施的“唤醒并呼吸方案”对镇静和谵妄的影响。

设计

实施前后研究设计。

地点

一个拥有22张床位的外科和内科混合ICU。

患者

2010年6月至2013年1月期间连续收治的702例接受机械通气的ICU患者。

干预措施

作为一项质量改进项目,实施每日配对的自主唤醒试验(每日镇静假期加自主呼吸试验)。

测量指标及主要结果

实施我们的方案后,工作日里里士满躁动镇静量表(Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale)平均得分增加了0.88(p < 0.0001),周末里士满躁动镇静量表平均得分增加了1.21(p < 0.0001)。在对年龄、种族、性别、疾病严重程度、主要诊断和ICU进行校正后,方案实施后谵妄的发病率和患病率没有变化(发病率:实施前23% vs 实施后19.6%;p = 0.40;患病率:实施前66.7% vs 实施后55.3%;p = 0.06)。谵妄/昏迷的合并患病率从方案实施前的90.8%降至实施后的85%(优势比,0.505;95%可信区间,0.299 - 0.853;p = 0.01)。

结论

实施“唤醒并呼吸方案”可减少重症机械通气患者的镇静,但并未改变谵妄的发病率或患病率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5594/4311879/8ca2ba66fafc/nihms655309f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Comparison of SAT and SBT Conduct During the ABC Trial and PILOT Trial.ABC试验和先导试验期间SAT与SBT实施情况的比较
J Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;40(1):3-9. doi: 10.1177/08850666231213337. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
9
Time trends of delirium rates in the intensive care unit.ICU 中谵妄发生率的时间趋势。
Heart Lung. 2020 Sep-Oct;49(5):572-577. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验