Papageorgiou Spyridon N
Department of Orthodontics Department of Oral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J Orthod. 2014 Dec;41(4):317-26. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000111.
Systematic reviews ideally provide a comprehensive and unbiased summary of existing evidence from clinical studies, whilst meta-analysis combines the results of these studies to produce an overall estimate. Collectively, this makes them invaluable for clinical decision-making. Although the number of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses in orthodontics has increased, questions are often raised about their methodological soundness. In this primer, the first steps of meta-analysis are discussed, namely the choice of an effect measure to express the results of included studies, and the choice of a statistical model for the meta-analysis. Clinical orthodontic examples are given to explain the various options available, the thought process behind the choice between them and their interpretation.
系统评价理论上能对临床研究的现有证据进行全面且无偏倚的总结,而荟萃分析则将这些研究结果合并以得出总体估计值。总体而言,这使其对临床决策具有极高价值。尽管正畸领域已发表的系统评价和荟萃分析数量有所增加,但人们常常对其方法学的合理性提出质疑。在本入门指南中,将讨论荟萃分析的初始步骤,即选择用于表达纳入研究结果的效应量度,以及选择荟萃分析的统计模型。文中给出了临床正畸实例,以解释可用的各种选项、在它们之间进行选择背后的思考过程及其解读。