Bonkhoff H, Wernert N
Department of General and Special Pathology, University of the Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Federal Republic of Germany.
Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1989;414(4):339-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00734089.
A technique is described which allows precise assessment of the topographical relationship between the estrogen receptor (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR) in the same histological section. It is based on the analysis of the results of immunohistochemical double staining by computer-assisted image processing. Five human ductal breast cancers were examined. The simultaneous demonstration of both receptors consists in the following principal steps: The primary antisera against the ER (monoclonal rat antibody) and the PR (monoclonal mouse antibody) are incubated simultaneously, but only the anti-ER antibody is demonstrated in the first staining step by using a goat anti-rat antibody as the linking antibody and the PAP complex from the rat, both antisera from the ER-ICA kit. The result is stored as a digitized grey image ("1. object image"). Then the colored end product and the residual peroxidase activity of the PAP complex are removed. In the second staining sequence the anti-PR-antibody is demonstrated by using a rabbit anti-mouse antibody as the linking antibody and the PAP complex from the mouse. The result is exactly positioned and also stored as a digitized grey image ("2. object image"). Though antibodies raised in different species were used, cross-reactivity could not be avoided. Grey values generated by cross-reactivity between the different antibody systems are evaluated in negative controls and are eliminated in the object images. The remaining (specifically stained) structures of both object images are copied into a final image so that the topographical relationship of the ER and the PR becomes obvious. The results show that in the five carcinomas investigated three types of receptor-positive tumour cells can be distinguished: Cells which coexpress the ER and the PR (1), cells which express either the ER (2) or the PR (3). The number of tumour cells showing one of these expression patterns varies from tumour to tumour.
本文描述了一种技术,该技术可在同一组织切片中精确评估雌激素受体(ER)与孕激素受体(PR)之间的拓扑关系。它基于通过计算机辅助图像处理对免疫组织化学双重染色结果的分析。对五例人类乳腺导管癌进行了检查。两种受体的同时显示包括以下主要步骤:针对ER(单克隆大鼠抗体)和PR(单克隆小鼠抗体)的一抗同时孵育,但在第一步染色中,仅使用山羊抗大鼠抗体作为连接抗体和来自大鼠的PAP复合物(均来自ER-ICA试剂盒的两种抗血清)来显示抗ER抗体。结果存储为数字化灰度图像(“1.目标图像”)。然后去除有色终产物和PAP复合物的残留过氧化物酶活性。在第二个染色序列中,使用兔抗小鼠抗体作为连接抗体和来自小鼠的PAP复合物来显示抗PR抗体。结果被精确定位并也存储为数字化灰度图像(“2.目标图像”)。尽管使用了在不同物种中产生的抗体,但交叉反应无法避免。在阴性对照中评估由不同抗体系统之间的交叉反应产生的灰度值,并在目标图像中消除。将两个目标图像中剩余的(特异性染色的)结构复制到最终图像中,以便ER和PR的拓扑关系变得明显。结果表明,在所研究的五例癌中,可以区分出三种类型的受体阳性肿瘤细胞:同时表达ER和PR的细胞(1)、仅表达ER(2)或仅表达PR(3)的细胞。显示这些表达模式之一的肿瘤细胞数量因肿瘤而异。