Kookana Rai S, Williams Mike, Boxall Alistair B A, Larsson D G Joakim, Gaw Sally, Choi Kyungho, Yamamoto Hiroshi, Thatikonda Shashidhar, Zhu Yong-Guan, Carriquiriborde Pedro
CSIRO, Private Mail Bag No 2, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
CSIRO, Private Mail Bag No 2, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 19;369(1656). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0586.
Active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) can enter the natural environment during manufacture, use and/or disposal, and consequently public concern about their potential adverse impacts in the environment is growing. Despite the bulk of the human population living in Asia and Africa (mostly in low- or middle-income countries), limited work relating to research, development and regulations on APIs in the environment have so far been conducted in these regions. Also, the API manufacturing sector is gradually shifting to countries with lower production costs. This paper focuses mainly on APIs for human consumption and highlights key differences between the low-, middle- and high-income countries, covering factors such as population and demographics, manufacture, prescriptions, treatment, disposal and reuse of waste and wastewater. The striking differences in populations (both human and animal), urbanization, sewer connectivity and other factors have revealed that the environmental compartments receiving the bulk of API residues differ markedly between low- and high-income countries. High sewer connectivity in developed countries allows capture and treatment of the waste stream (point-source). However, in many low- or middle-income countries, sewerage connectivity is generally low and in some areas waste is collected predominantly in septic systems. Consequently, the diffuse-source impact, such as on groundwater from leaking septic systems or on land due to disposal of raw sewage or septage, may be of greater concern. A screening level assessment of potential burdens of APIs in urban and rural environments of countries representing low- and middle-income as well as high-income has been made. Implications for ecological risks of APIs used by humans in lower income countries are discussed.
活性药物成分(APIs)在生产、使用和/或处置过程中会进入自然环境,因此公众对其在环境中潜在不利影响的关注度日益提高。尽管大多数人口生活在亚洲和非洲(主要是低收入或中等收入国家),但迄今为止,这些地区在活性药物成分在环境方面的研究、开发和监管方面开展的工作有限。此外,活性药物成分制造行业正逐渐向生产成本较低的国家转移。本文主要关注用于人类消费的活性药物成分,并突出低收入、中等收入和高收入国家之间的关键差异,涵盖人口和人口统计学、生产、处方、治疗、废物和废水的处置及再利用等因素。在人口(包括人类和动物)、城市化、下水道连通性及其他因素方面存在的显著差异表明,接收大部分活性药物成分残留的环境介质在低收入国家和高收入国家之间存在明显不同。发达国家较高的下水道连通性使得能够捕获和处理废物流(点源)。然而,在许多低收入或中等收入国家,下水道连通性普遍较低,在一些地区,废物主要收集在化粪池系统中。因此,诸如化粪池系统泄漏对地下水的影响或未经处理的污水或污水污泥处置对土地的影响等面源影响可能更令人担忧。本文对代表低收入、中等收入和高收入国家的城市和农村环境中活性药物成分的潜在负担进行了筛选水平评估。讨论了低收入国家人类使用的活性药物成分对生态风险的影响。