• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减轻污染物驱动的风险,以保障城市化世界中农业-卫生循环经济的安全扩展。

Mitigating Contaminant-Driven Risks for the Safe Expansion of the Agricultural-Sanitation Circular Economy in an Urbanizing World.

作者信息

Carter Laura J, Dennis Sarah, Allen Katie, McKenna Patrick, Chen Xiaohui, Daniell Tim J, Evans Barbara, Guest Jeremy S, Guo Hongyan, Kirk Stuart, Zhu Yong-Guan, Anik Asif Reza, Zuhra Naqshe, Banwart Steven A

机构信息

School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, U.K.

Global Food and Environment Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.

出版信息

ACS ES T Water. 2024 Feb 15;4(4):1166-1176. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.3c00803. eCollection 2024 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1021/acsestwater.3c00803
PMID:38633372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11019536/
Abstract

The widespread adoption of an agricultural circular economy requires the recovery of resources such as water, organic matter, and nutrients from livestock manure and sanitation. While this approach offers many benefits, we argue this is not without potential risks to human and environmental health that largely stem from the presence of contaminants in the recycled resources (e.g., pharmaceuticals, pathogens). We discuss context specific challenges and solutions across the three themes: (1) contaminant monitoring; (2) collection transport and treatment; and (3) regulation and policy. We advocate for the redesign of sanitary and agricultural management practices to enable safe resource reuse in a proportionate and effective way. In populous urban regions with access to sanitation provision, processes can be optimized using emergent technologies to maximize removal of contaminant from excreta prior to reuse. Comparatively, in regions with limited existing capacity for conveyance of excreta to centralized treatment facilities, we suggest efforts should focus on creation of collection facilities (e.g., pit latrines) and decentralized treatment options such as composting systems. Overall, circular economy approaches to sanitation and resource management offer a potential solution to a pressing challenge; however, to ensure this is done in a safe manner, contaminant risks must be mitigated.

摘要

农业循环经济的广泛采用需要从畜禽粪便和卫生设施中回收水、有机物和养分等资源。虽然这种方法有许多好处,但我们认为这并非没有对人类和环境健康造成潜在风险,这些风险很大程度上源于回收资源中存在的污染物(如药物、病原体)。我们讨论了三个主题下针对具体情况的挑战和解决方案:(1)污染物监测;(2)收集运输和处理;(3)监管和政策。我们主张重新设计卫生和农业管理做法,以实现安全、适度且有效的资源再利用。在有人口居住且能提供卫生设施的城市地区,可以利用新兴技术优化处理流程,以在再利用前最大限度地去除排泄物中的污染物。相比之下,在现有将排泄物输送至集中处理设施的能力有限的地区,我们建议应将工作重点放在创建收集设施(如坑式厕所)以及分散式处理方案(如堆肥系统)上。总体而言,卫生和资源管理的循环经济方法为应对紧迫挑战提供了一个潜在解决方案;然而,为确保以安全方式开展此项工作,必须降低污染物风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e36/11019536/76ad52083496/ew3c00803_0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e36/11019536/bc5077239fa0/ew3c00803_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e36/11019536/76ad52083496/ew3c00803_0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e36/11019536/bc5077239fa0/ew3c00803_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e36/11019536/76ad52083496/ew3c00803_0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Mitigating Contaminant-Driven Risks for the Safe Expansion of the Agricultural-Sanitation Circular Economy in an Urbanizing World.减轻污染物驱动的风险,以保障城市化世界中农业-卫生循环经济的安全扩展。
ACS ES T Water. 2024 Feb 15;4(4):1166-1176. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.3c00803. eCollection 2024 Apr 12.
2
The pit latrine paradox in low-income settings: A sanitation technology of choice or a pollution hotspot?低收入环境中的旱厕悖论:一种卫生技术选择还是污染热点?
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 25;879:163179. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163179. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
4
Adopt or Adapt: Sanitation Technology Choices in Urbanizing Malawi.采用还是适应:城市化进程中的马拉维卫生技术选择
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0161262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161262. eCollection 2016.
5
Linking energy-sanitation-agriculture: Intersectional resource management in smallholder households in Tanzania.将能源-卫生-农业联系起来:坦桑尼亚小农家庭的交叉资源管理。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jul 15;590-591:514-530. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.205. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
6
Sustainable sanitation technology options for urban slums.城市贫民窟的可持续卫生技术选择。
Biotechnol Adv. 2012 Sep-Oct;30(5):964-78. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
7
Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.地表水和地下水中污染物的来源、途径及相对风险:为沃克顿调查准备的一份报告
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2002 Jan 11;65(1):1-142. doi: 10.1080/152873902753338572.
8
Can Sanitation Technology Play a Role in User Perceptions of Resource Recovery? An Evaluation of Composting Latrine Use in Developing World Communities in Panama.卫生技术能否在用户对资源回收的看法中发挥作用?巴拿马发展中社区堆肥厕所使用情况评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Oct 16;52(20):11803-11812. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02431. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
9
Moving up the Sanitation Ladder while Considering Function: An Assessment of Indigenous Communities, Pit Latrine Users, and Their Perceptions of Resource Recovery Sanitation Technology in Panama.在考虑功能的前提下提升卫生水平:对巴拿马原住民社区、坑式厕所使用者及其对资源回收卫生技术看法的评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Dec 1;54(23):15405-15413. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04120. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
10
Small-scale on-site treatment of fecal matter: comparison of treatments for resource recovery and sanitization.小规模现场粪便处理:资源回收和消毒处理的比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(45):63945-63964. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12911-z. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward Property-Based Regulation.迈向基于属性的监管。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Aug 15;57(32):11718-11730. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00643. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Wastewater reuse in agriculture: Prospects and challenges.农业中的废水再利用:前景与挑战。
Environ Res. 2023 Nov 1;236(Pt 1):116711. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116711. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
3
Genomic analysis of sewage from 101 countries reveals global landscape of antimicrobial resistance.对 101 个国家污水的基因组分析揭示了全球抗微生物药物耐药性的状况。
Nat Commun. 2022 Dec 1;13(1):7251. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34312-7.
4
Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of nitrogen recovery by ammonia air-stripping from wastewater treatment.废水处理中氨汽提回收氮的生命周期评价和技术经济分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 20;857(Pt 3):159499. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159499. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
5
Behavioral intentions of rural farmers to recycle human excreta in agriculture.农村农民对农业中回收人类排泄物的行为意图。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 7;12(1):5890. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09917-z.
6
From gut to mud: dissemination of antimicrobial resistance between animal and agricultural niches.从肠道到泥地:动物和农业生态位之间抗菌药物耐药性的传播。
Environ Microbiol. 2022 Aug;24(8):3290-3306. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15927. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
To separate or not? A comparison of wastewater management systems for the new city district of Hiedanranta, Finland.是否要分离?芬兰海达伦新城区废水管理系统比较。
Environ Res. 2022 May 15;208:112764. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112764. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
8
Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities.超越新实体的行星边界安全运行空间。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Feb 1;56(3):1510-1521. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
9
How does partial substitution of chemical fertiliser with organic forms increase sustainability of agricultural production?用有机形式部分替代化肥如何提高农业生产的可持续性?
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 10;803:149933. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149933. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
10
A review of combined sewer overflows as a source of wastewater-derived emerging contaminants in the environment and their management.合流制下水道溢流作为环境中废水衍生新出现污染物的来源及其管理综述。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr 29;28(25):32095-110. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14103-1.