Suppr超能文献

60岁以下患者接受机械主动脉瓣置换术后的长期出血事件。

Long-term bleeding events after mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60.

作者信息

Swinkels B M, de Mol B A, Kelder J C, Vermeulen F E, Ten Berg J M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands,

出版信息

Neth Heart J. 2015 Feb;23(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0626-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although younger patients are supposed to be less susceptible to bleeding complications of mechanical aortic valve replacement (mAVR) than older patients, there is a relative paucity of data on this subject. Therefore, it remains uncertain whether younger patients are really at a lower risk of these complications than older patients.

METHODS

Incidence rates of bleeding events during 15 years of follow-up after mAVR were compared between 163 patients under 60 (group I), 122 patients between 60 and 65 (group II), and 145 patients over 65 (group III) years of age at operation. The target international normalised ratio (INR) was 3.0-4.0.

RESULTS

During 15 years of follow-up, the annual incidence rate of major bleeding events (excluding haemorrhagic stroke) was lower in the youngest as compared with the oldest group (3.0 versus 4.7 %, respectively; p = 0.030). However, the annual incidence rate of haemorrhagic stroke was as high in the youngest as in the two older groups (0.6 versus 0.7 % and 0.7 %, respectively; p = 0.928).

CONCLUSIONS

With a target INR of 3.0-4.0, patients under 60 years of age are at equally high risk of haemorrhagic stroke after mAVR as older patients. This finding confirms the relevance of a lower target INR as used in international guidelines.

摘要

背景

虽然年轻患者相比老年患者,机械主动脉瓣置换术(mAVR)出血并发症的易感性理应更低,但关于这一主题的数据相对较少。因此,年轻患者这些并发症的风险是否真的低于老年患者仍不确定。

方法

比较了163例手术时年龄小于60岁(I组)、122例年龄在60至65岁之间(II组)和145例年龄大于65岁(III组)的患者在mAVR术后15年随访期间的出血事件发生率。目标国际标准化比值(INR)为3.0 - 4.0。

结果

在15年的随访期间,最年轻组的主要出血事件(不包括出血性中风)年发生率低于最年长组(分别为3.0%对4.7%;p = 0.030)。然而,最年轻组的出血性中风年发生率与两个较年长组一样高(分别为0.6%对0.7%和0.7%;p = 0.928)。

结论

目标INR为3.0 - 4.0时,60岁以下患者mAVR术后出血性中风的风险与老年患者一样高。这一发现证实了国际指南中使用较低目标INR的相关性。

相似文献

1
Long-term bleeding events after mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 60.
Neth Heart J. 2015 Feb;23(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0626-9.
6
Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 Years and Younger.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct;106(4):1113-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.073. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
10
Perioperative and long-term outcomes of Ross versus mechanical aortic valve replacement.
J Card Surg. 2022 Oct;37(10):2963-2971. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16831. Epub 2022 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

2
Anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valves: follow the guidelines!
Neth Heart J. 2015 Feb;23(2):109-10. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0642-9.

本文引用的文献

6
Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;85(4):1490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.082.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验