Carr Michelle, Nielsen Tore
Dream and Nightmare Laboratory, Center for Advanced Research in Sleep Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Sleep. 2015 Mar 1;38(3):433-43. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4504.
The goal of the study was to assess semantic priming to emotion and nonemotion cue words using a novel measure of associational breadth for participants who either took rapid eye movement (REM) or nonrapid eye movement (NREM) naps or who remained awake; assess relation of priming to REM sleep consolidation and REM sleep inertia effects.
The associational breadth task was applied in both a priming condition, where cue-words were signaled to be memorized prior to sleep (primed), and a nonpriming condition, where cue words were not memorized (nonprimed). Cue words were either emotional (positive, negative) or nonemotional. Participants were randomly assigned to either an awake (WAKE) or a sleep condition, which was subsequently split into NREM or REM groups depending on stage at awakening.
Hospital-based sleep laboratory.
Fifty-eight healthy participants (22 male) ages 18 to 35 y (Mage = 23.3 ± 4.08 y).
The REM group scored higher than the NREM or WAKE groups on primed, but not nonprimed emotional cue words; the effect was stronger for positive than for negative cue words. However, REM time and percent correlated negatively with degree of emotional priming. Priming occurred for REM awakenings but not for NREM awakenings, even when the latter sleep episodes contained some REM sleep.
Associational breadth may be selectively consolidated during REM sleep for stimuli that have been tagged as important for future memory retrieval. That priming decreased with REM time and was higher only for REM sleep awakenings is consistent with two explanatory REM sleep processes: REM sleep consolidation serving emotional downregulation and REM sleep inertia.
本研究的目的是使用一种新的联想广度测量方法,评估快速眼动(REM)或非快速眼动(NREM)小睡或保持清醒的参与者对情绪和非情绪提示词的语义启动;评估启动与REM睡眠巩固和REM睡眠惯性效应之间的关系。
联想广度任务在两种条件下进行,一种是启动条件,即提示词在睡眠前被标记为需要记忆(启动),另一种是非启动条件,即提示词不被记忆(未启动)。提示词分为情绪性(积极、消极)或非情绪性。参与者被随机分配到清醒(WAKE)或睡眠条件,随后根据觉醒阶段分为NREM或REM组。
基于医院的睡眠实验室。
58名年龄在18至35岁(平均年龄=23.3±4.08岁)的健康参与者(22名男性)。
REM组在启动的情绪提示词上得分高于NREM组或WAKE组,但在未启动的情绪提示词上得分无差异;积极提示词的效应比消极提示词更强。然而,REM时间和百分比与情绪启动程度呈负相关。REM觉醒时出现启动,而NREM觉醒时未出现启动,即使后者的睡眠阶段包含一些REM睡眠。
对于被标记为对未来记忆检索很重要的刺激,联想广度可能在REM睡眠期间被选择性巩固。启动随REM时间减少且仅在REM睡眠觉醒时更高,这与两个解释性的REM睡眠过程一致:REM睡眠巩固有助于情绪下调和REM睡眠惯性。