Swindale Nicholas V, Spacek Martin A
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2550 Willow St., Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V5Z 3N9,
J Comput Neurosci. 2015 Apr;38(2):249-61. doi: 10.1007/s10827-014-0539-z. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
This paper compares the ability of different methods to detect and resolve spikes recorded extracellularly with polytrode and high-density microelectrode arrays (MEAs). Detecting spikes on such arrays is more complex than with single electrodes or tetrodes since a single spike from a neuron may cause threshold crossings on several adjacent channels, giving rise to multiple events. These initial events have to be recognized as belonging to a single spike. Combining them is, in essence, a clustering problem. A conflicting need is to be able to resolve spike waveforms that occur close together in space and time. We first evaluated three different detection methods, using simulated data in which spike shape waveforms obtained from real recordings were added to noise with an amplitude and temporal structure similar to that found in real recordings. Performance was assessed by calculating the percentage of correctly identified spikes vs. the false positive rate. Using the best of these detection methods, two different methods for avoiding multiple detections per spike were tested: one based on windowing and the other based on clustering. Using parameters that avoided spatial and temporal duplication, the spatiotemporal resolution of the two methods was next evaluated. The method based on clustering gave slightly better results. Both methods could resolve spikes occurring 1 ms or more apart, regardless of their spatial separation. There was no restriction on the temporal resolution of spike pairs for units more than 200 μm apart.
本文比较了不同方法检测和解析通过多电极和高密度微电极阵列(MEA)在细胞外记录的尖峰的能力。在这样的阵列上检测尖峰比使用单电极或四极管更复杂,因为来自神经元的单个尖峰可能会导致几个相邻通道上的阈值交叉,从而产生多个事件。这些初始事件必须被识别为属于单个尖峰。将它们组合起来本质上是一个聚类问题。另一个相互矛盾的需求是能够解析在空间和时间上紧密相邻出现的尖峰波形。我们首先评估了三种不同的检测方法,使用模拟数据,其中将从真实记录中获得的尖峰形状波形添加到具有与真实记录中发现的幅度和时间结构相似的噪声中。通过计算正确识别的尖峰百分比与误报率来评估性能。使用这些检测方法中最好的一种,测试了两种不同的避免每个尖峰多次检测的方法:一种基于加窗,另一种基于聚类。使用避免空间和时间重复的参数,接下来评估这两种方法的时空分辨率。基于聚类的方法给出了稍好的结果。两种方法都可以解析相隔1毫秒或更长时间出现的尖峰,无论它们的空间间隔如何。对于相隔超过200μm的单元,尖峰对的时间分辨率没有限制。