Anguah Katherene O-B, Wonnell Brittany S, Campbell Wayne W, McCabe George P, McCrory Megan A
Departments of Nutrition Science Ingestive Behavior Research Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Departments of Nutrition Science.
J Nutr. 2014 Dec;144(12):1963-9. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.195545. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
Disrupting the physical structure of pulses by blending them or by using a digestive supplement (α-galactosidase) to reduce intestinal discomfort could potentially negate the previously observed beneficial effects of whole pulses of lowering appetitive and glycemic responses because of more rapid digestion.
We hypothesized that blended lentils, α-galactosidase, or both increase postprandial appetite and blood glucose responses vs. whole lentils.
Men and women [n = 12; means ± SDs body mass index (kg/m(2)): 23.3 ± 3.1; aged 28 ± 10 y] consumed breakfast meals containing whole (W), blended (B), or no lentils [control (C)], each with 3 α-galactosidase or placebo capsules in a randomized, crossover, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Between each test day there was a 3- to 5-d washout period.
Mixed-model ANOVA showed effects of meal on postprandial appetite and glucose (P = 0.0001-0.031). The B meal resulted in higher postprandial appetite ratings than did the W meal but not the C meal for hunger, desire to eat, and prospective consumption (Δ = 0.4-0.5 points; P = 0.002-0.044). Postprandial glucose concentration was 4.5 mg/dL lower for the B meal than for the C meal (P < 0.0001) but did not differ from the W meal. There were no main effects of α-galactosidase, but there were meal × α-galactosidase interaction effects, with a greater postprandial desire to eat and lower postprandial fullness with the B meal than with the 2 other meals in the placebo condition but not in the α-galactosidase condition.
Blending lentils increased appetite (∼6%), but not glycemic response, compared with whole lentils, whereas α-galactosidase did not. Both B and W meals may be consumed (with or without an α-galactosidase supplement) with little impact on appetite, without increasing glycemic response. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02110511.
通过混合豆类或使用消化补充剂(α-半乳糖苷酶)来破坏豆类的物理结构以减轻肠道不适,可能会因为消化加快而抵消之前观察到的完整豆类对降低食欲和血糖反应的有益作用。
我们假设与完整小扁豆相比,混合小扁豆、α-半乳糖苷酶或两者都会增加餐后食欲和血糖反应。
在一项随机、交叉、双盲安慰剂对照试验中,男性和女性[n = 12;平均±标准差体重指数(kg/m²):23.3 ± 3.1;年龄28 ± 10岁]食用包含完整(W)、混合(B)或不含小扁豆[对照(C)]的早餐,每种早餐搭配3粒α-半乳糖苷酶胶囊或安慰剂胶囊。在每个测试日之间有3至5天的洗脱期。
混合模型方差分析显示餐食对餐后食欲和血糖有影响(P = 0.0001 - 0.031)。对于饥饿、进食欲望和预期摄入量,B餐导致的餐后食欲评分高于W餐,但不高于C餐(差值 = 0.4 - 0.5分;P = 0.002 - 0.044)。B餐的餐后血糖浓度比C餐低4.5 mg/dL(P < 0.0001),但与W餐无差异。α-半乳糖苷酶没有主要作用,但存在餐食×α-半乳糖苷酶的交互作用,在安慰剂组中,与其他两种餐食相比,B餐的餐后进食欲望更强,饱腹感更低,但在α-半乳糖苷酶组中并非如此。
与完整小扁豆相比,混合小扁豆会增加食欲(约6%),但不会增加血糖反应,而α-半乳糖苷酶则不会。B餐和W餐都可以食用(无论是否补充α-半乳糖苷酶),对食欲影响很小,且不会增加血糖反应。该试验在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT02110511。