Rubinstein Amir, Chor Benny
School of Computer Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Nov 20;10(11):e1003897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003897. eCollection 2014 Nov.
We join the increasing call to take computational education of life science students a step further, beyond teaching mere programming and employing existing software tools. We describe a new course, focusing on enriching the curriculum of life science students with abstract, algorithmic, and logical thinking, and exposing them to the computational "culture." The design, structure, and content of our course are influenced by recent efforts in this area, collaborations with life scientists, and our own instructional experience. Specifically, we suggest that an effective course of this nature should: (1) devote time to explicitly reflect upon computational thinking processes, resisting the temptation to drift to purely practical instruction, (2) focus on discrete notions, rather than on continuous ones, and (3) have basic programming as a prerequisite, so students need not be preoccupied with elementary programming issues. We strongly recommend that the mere use of existing bioinformatics tools and packages should not replace hands-on programming. Yet, we suggest that programming will mostly serve as a means to practice computational thinking processes. This paper deals with the challenges and considerations of such computational education for life science students. It also describes a concrete implementation of the course and encourages its use by others.
我们响应越来越多的呼声,将生命科学专业学生的计算教育向前推进一步,而不仅仅是教授编程和使用现有的软件工具。我们描述了一门新课程,重点是用抽象、算法和逻辑思维丰富生命科学专业学生的课程,并让他们接触计算“文化”。我们课程的设计、结构和内容受到该领域近期努力、与生命科学家的合作以及我们自己教学经验的影响。具体而言,我们建议这样一门有效的课程应该:(1)花时间明确反思计算思维过程,抵制纯粹进行实践教学的诱惑;(2)关注离散概念,而非连续概念;(3)以基础编程为前提条件,这样学生就不必纠结于基础编程问题。我们强烈建议,仅仅使用现有的生物信息学工具和软件包不应取代实践编程。然而,我们认为编程主要将作为实践计算思维过程的一种手段。本文探讨了针对生命科学专业学生进行此类计算教育的挑战和注意事项。它还描述了该课程的具体实施情况,并鼓励其他人采用。