Van Melle Elaine, Lockyer Jocelyn, Curran Vernon, Lieff Susan, St Onge Christina, Goldszmidt Mark
Centre for Studies in Primary Care, Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; CanMEDS Education Scientist, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Med Educ. 2014 Dec;48(12):1190-200. doi: 10.1111/medu.12543.
Education scholarship (ES) is integral to the transformation of medical education. Faculty members who engage in ES need encouragement and recognition of this work. Beginning with the definition of ES as 'an umbrella term which can encompass both research and innovation in health professions education', and which as such represents an activity that is separate and distinct from teaching and leadership, the purpose of our study was to explore how promotion policies and processes are used in Canadian medical schools to support and promote ES.
We conducted an analysis of the promotion policies of 17 Canadian medical schools and interviews with a key informant at each institution. We drew on an interpretive approach to policy analysis to analyse the data and to understand explicit messages about how ES was represented and supported.
Of the 17 schools' promotion documents, only nine contained specific reference to ES. There was wide variation in focus and level of detail. All key informants indicated that ES is recognised and considered for academic promotion. Barriers to the support and recognition of ES included a lack of understanding of ES and its relationship to teaching and leadership. This was manifest in the variability in promotion policies and processes, support systems, and career planning and pathways for ES.
This lack of clarity may make it challenging for medical school faculty members to make sense of how they might successfully align ES within an academic career. There is a need therefore to better articulate ES in promotion policies and support systems. Creating a common understanding of ES, developing guidelines to assess the impact of all forms of ES, developing an informed leadership and system of mentors, and creating explicit role descriptions and guidelines are identified as potential strategies to ensure that ES is appropriately valued.
教育学术研究(ES)是医学教育变革不可或缺的一部分。从事教育学术研究的教员需要对这项工作予以鼓励和认可。我们的研究从将教育学术研究定义为“一个涵盖健康职业教育研究与创新的统称”开始,鉴于此,教育学术研究代表着一项与教学和领导工作相分离且不同的活动,其目的是探究加拿大医学院校如何利用晋升政策和流程来支持和促进教育学术研究。
我们对17所加拿大医学院校的晋升政策进行了分析,并对每所院校的一名关键信息提供者进行了访谈。我们采用解释性政策分析方法来分析数据,并理解关于教育学术研究如何被呈现和支持的明确信息。
在17所学校的晋升文件中,只有9份特别提到了教育学术研究。在重点和细节程度上存在很大差异。所有关键信息提供者均表示,教育学术研究在学术晋升中得到认可和考虑。支持和认可教育学术研究的障碍包括对教育学术研究及其与教学和领导关系的理解不足。这在晋升政策和流程、支持系统以及教育学术研究的职业规划和发展路径的差异中体现出来。
这种不明确可能使医学院教员难以理解他们如何才能在学术生涯中成功地将教育学术研究与之结合。因此,需要在晋升政策和支持系统中更好地阐明教育学术研究。形成对教育学术研究的共同理解、制定评估各种形式教育学术研究影响的指导方针、建立明智的领导体系和导师制度,以及制定明确的角色描述和指导方针,被确定为确保教育学术研究得到适当重视的潜在策略。