Carnero Elena, Barriocanal Marina, Segura Victor, Guruceaga Elizabeth, Prior Celia, Börner Kathleen, Grimm Dirk, Fortes Puri
Department of Gene therapy and Hepatology, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra , Pamplona , Spain.
Bioinformatics Unit, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra , Pamplona , Spain.
Front Immunol. 2014 Nov 6;5:548. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00548. eCollection 2014.
Interferons (IFNs) are key players in the antiviral response. IFN sensing by the cell activates transcription of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) able to induce an antiviral state by affecting viral replication and release. IFN also induces the expression of ISGs that function as negative regulators to limit the strength and duration of IFN response. The ISGs identified so far belong to coding genes. However, only a small proportion of the transcriptome corresponds to coding transcripts and it has been estimated that there could be as many coding as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). To address whether IFN can also regulate the expression of lncRNAs, we analyzed the transcriptome of HuH7 cells treated or not with IFNα2 by expression arrays. Analysis of the arrays showed increased levels of several well-characterized coding genes that respond to IFN both at early or late times. Furthermore, we identified several IFN-stimulated or -downregulated lncRNAs (ISRs and IDRs). Further validation showed that ISR2, 8, and 12 expression mimics that of their neighboring genes GBP1, IRF1, and IL6, respectively, all related to the IFN response. These genes are induced in response to different doses of IFNα2 in different cell lines at early (ISR2 or 8) or later (ISR12) time points. IFNβ also induced the expression of these lncRNAs. ISR2 and 8 were also induced by an influenza virus unable to block the IFN response but not by other wild-type lytic viruses tested. Surprisingly, both ISR2 and 8 were significantly upregulated in cultured cells and livers from patients infected with HCV. Increased levels of ISR2 were also detected in patients chronically infected with HIV. This is relevant as genome-wide guilt-by-association studies predict that ISR2, 8, and 12 may function in viral processes, in the IFN pathway and the antiviral response. Therefore, we propose that these lncRNAs could be induced by IFN to function as positive or negative regulators of the antiviral response.
干扰素(IFNs)是抗病毒反应的关键参与者。细胞对干扰素的感知会激活干扰素刺激基因(ISGs)的转录,这些基因能够通过影响病毒复制和释放来诱导抗病毒状态。干扰素还会诱导作为负调节因子的ISGs表达,以限制干扰素反应的强度和持续时间。目前已鉴定出的ISGs属于编码基因。然而,转录组中只有一小部分对应于编码转录本,据估计,编码RNA和长链非编码RNA(lncRNAs)的数量可能一样多。为了研究干扰素是否也能调节lncRNAs的表达,我们通过表达阵列分析了用或未用IFNα2处理的HuH7细胞的转录组。阵列分析显示,在早期或晚期对干扰素产生反应的几个特征明确的编码基因水平升高。此外,我们鉴定出了几种干扰素刺激或下调的lncRNAs(ISRs和IDRs)。进一步验证表明,ISR2、8和12的表达分别与其邻近基因GBP1、IRF1和IL6相似,这些基因都与干扰素反应相关。这些基因在不同细胞系中,在早期(ISR2或8)或晚期(ISR12)时间点,对不同剂量的IFNα2产生反应而被诱导。IFNβ也诱导了这些lncRNAs的表达。ISR2和8也被一种无法阻断干扰素反应的流感病毒诱导,但未被测试的其他野生型裂解病毒诱导。令人惊讶的是,在丙型肝炎病毒感染患者的培养细胞和肝脏中,ISR2和8均显著上调。在慢性感染HIV的患者中也检测到ISR2水平升高。这很重要,因为全基因组关联研究预测,ISR2、8和12可能在病毒过程、干扰素途径和抗病毒反应中发挥作用。因此,我们提出这些lncRNAs可能被干扰素诱导,作为抗病毒反应的正调节因子或负调节因子发挥作用。