Suppr超能文献

使用颜色评估幼儿疼痛:“彩虹疼痛量表”的验证——一项原理验证研究

Using colors to assess pain in toddlers: validation of "the rainbow pain scale"-a proof-of-principle study.

作者信息

Mahon Paula, Holsti Liisa, Siden Harold, Strahlendorf Caron, Turnham Lucy, Giaschi Deborah

机构信息

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2015 Jan-Feb;32(1):40-6. doi: 10.1177/1043454214555197. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

Abstract

Self-report, when available, is considered the ideal way to assess the intensity and other aspects of pain in children. However, self-report scales are often too complex cognitively for preschool-aged children (2-4 years). The Rainbow Pain Scale (RPS) was developed to provide individualized self-reported pain ratings for preschool-aged children. The psychometric properties of this scale have yet to be evaluated. To ensure validity, our first step was to compare RPS scores to a well-validated scale in older children who were able to self-report their pain. The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the RPS in children aged 5 to 10 years as proof of principle. We compared ratings of 49 children's pain using the RPS with those on the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Participants suffering from pain related to cancer and cancer treatment were recruited to complete both scales at 3 time points, during both inpatient and outpatient clinic visits. Pearson's r and Cohen's κ were used to evaluate the level of association between the scales. The association between RPS and the FPS-R was greater than .7 at all 3 visits; r = .96 between the scales at the first clinic visit, .97 at the second visit, and .93 at the third visit. Cohen's κ between scales was 1.0 at the first clinic visit, .95 at the second visit, and .87 at the third visit. The RPS shows excellent concurrent validity with the FPS-R in school-aged children. The next step will be to examine the psychometric properties of the RPS in preschool-aged children.

摘要

如果可行,自我报告被认为是评估儿童疼痛强度及其他方面的理想方式。然而,自我报告量表对于学龄前儿童(2至4岁)而言,在认知上往往过于复杂。彩虹疼痛量表(RPS)旨在为学龄前儿童提供个性化的自我报告疼痛评分。该量表的心理测量特性尚未得到评估。为确保有效性,我们的第一步是将RPS得分与能够自我报告疼痛的大龄儿童中一个经过充分验证的量表进行比较。本研究的目的是评估5至10岁儿童中RPS的同时效度,作为原理验证。我们将49名儿童使用RPS的疼痛评分与面部疼痛量表修订版(FPS-R)的评分进行了比较。招募患有与癌症及癌症治疗相关疼痛的参与者,在住院和门诊就诊的3个时间点完成这两个量表。使用皮尔逊r系数和科恩κ系数来评估量表之间的关联程度。在所有3次就诊中,RPS与FPS-R之间的关联度均大于0.7;在第一次门诊就诊时,两个量表之间的r = 0.96,第二次就诊时为0.97,第三次就诊时为0.93。量表之间的科恩κ系数在第一次门诊就诊时为1.0,第二次就诊时为0.95,第三次就诊时为0.87。在学龄儿童中,RPS与FPS-R显示出极佳的同时效度。下一步将是检验RPS在学龄前儿童中的心理测量特性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验