Carvalho Thiago S, Bönecker Marcelo, Altenburger Markus J, Buzalaf Marília A R, Sampaio Fabio C, Lussi Adrian
Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, 3010, Bern, Switzerland,
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jul;19(6):1429-36. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1363-6. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
Calcium glycerophosphate (CaGP) was added to fluoride varnishes to analyze their preventive effect on initial enamel erosion and fluoride uptake: potassium hydroxide (KOH)-soluble and KOH-insoluble fluoride bound to enamel.
This study was carried out in two parts. Part 1: 108 enamel samples were randomly distributed into six varnish groups: base varnish (no active ingredients); Duraphat® (2.26%NaF); Duofluorid® (5.63%NaF/CaF2); experimental varnish 1 (1%CaGP/5.63 NaF/CaF2); experimental varnish 2 (5%CaGP/5.63%NaF/CaF2); and no varnish. Cyclic demineralization (90 s; citric acid, pH = 3.6) and remineralization (4 h) was made once a day, for 3 days. Change in surface microhardness (SMH) was measured. Part 2: 60 enamel samples were cut in half and received no varnish (control) or a layer of varnish: Duraphat®, Duofluorid®, experimental varnishes 1 and 2. Then, KOH-soluble and KOH-insoluble fluoride were analyzed using an electrode.
After cyclic demineralization, SMH decreased in all samples, but Duraphat® caused less hardness loss. No difference was observed between varnishes containing CaGP and the other varnishes. Similar amounts of KOH-soluble and insoluble fluoride was found in experimental varnish 1 and Duofluorid®, while lower values were found for experimental varnish 2 and Duraphat®.
The addition of CaGP to fluoride varnishes did not increase fluoride bound to enamel and did not enhance their protection against initial enamel erosion.
We observe that the fluoride varnishes containing CaGP do not promote greater amounts of fluoride bound to enamel and that fluoride bound to enamel may not be closely related to erosion prevention.
将甘油磷酸钙(CaGP)添加到氟化物清漆中,以分析其对早期釉质侵蚀和氟摄取的预防效果:与釉质结合的氢氧化钾(KOH)可溶性和KOH不溶性氟。
本研究分两部分进行。第1部分:将108个釉质样本随机分为6个清漆组:基础清漆(无活性成分);Duraphat®(2.26%氟化钠);Duofluorid®(5.63%氟化钠/氟化钙);实验清漆1(1%CaGP/5.63%氟化钠/氟化钙);实验清漆2(5%CaGP/5.63%氟化钠/氟化钙);以及不使用清漆。每天进行一次循环脱矿(90秒;柠檬酸,pH = 3.6)和再矿化(4小时),持续3天。测量表面显微硬度(SMH)的变化。第2部分:将60个釉质样本切成两半,不使用清漆(对照)或涂一层清漆:Duraphat®、Duofluorid®、实验清漆1和2。然后,使用电极分析KOH可溶性和KOH不溶性氟。
循环脱矿后,所有样本的SMH均下降,但Duraphat®导致的硬度损失较小。含CaGP的清漆与其他清漆之间未观察到差异。实验清漆1和Duofluorid®中发现的KOH可溶性和不溶性氟含量相似,而实验清漆2和Duraphat®的值较低。
在氟化物清漆中添加CaGP不会增加与釉质结合的氟,也不会增强其对早期釉质侵蚀的保护作用。
我们观察到,含CaGP的氟化物清漆不会促进更多与釉质结合的氟,且与釉质结合的氟可能与防侵蚀没有密切关系。