Altenburger Markus J, Schirrmeister Jörg F, Lussi Adrian, Klasser Manfred, Hellwig Elmar
Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital and Dental School, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Feb;117(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00585.x.
Limited information is available on the time-dependent or dosage-dependent cariostatic efficacy of highly concentrated fluoride compounds. This good clinical practice-conforming, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover in situ study tested the hypothesis that a 1.0% amine fluoride fluid is superior to a 0.5% amine fluoride fluid regarding fluoride retention and mineral change in initial caries enamel lesions over a period of 28 d. Fluoride retention was significantly higher after application of the two fluoride fluids compared with placebo but had decreased in both groups to similar levels after only 1 wk. Mineral gain was significantly higher for both verum groups compared with placebo. The use of 1% fluoride fluid resulted in significantly higher remineralization compared with the use of 0.5% fluoride fluid. For both fluoride fluids mineral gain followed a linear relationship with time during the experimental period, indicating a possible further uptake of mineral, even after 4 wk.
关于高浓度氟化物的时间依赖性或剂量依赖性防龋效果的信息有限。这项符合良好临床实践的双盲、安慰剂对照、原位交叉研究检验了以下假设:在28天的时间里,1.0%的氟化胺液在初始龋损牙釉质中的氟保留和矿物质变化方面优于0.5%的氟化胺液。与安慰剂相比,两种氟化物液体应用后氟保留显著更高,但两组仅在1周后就降至相似水平。与安慰剂相比,两个试验组的矿物质增加均显著更高。与使用0.5%的氟化胺液相比,使用1%的氟化胺液导致再矿化显著更高。对于两种氟化物液体,在实验期间矿物质增加与时间呈线性关系,这表明即使在4周后也可能进一步吸收矿物质。