• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The top attributes of excellence of intensive care physicians.

作者信息

Sprung Charles L, Cohen Robert, Marini John J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, PO Box 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel,

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2015 Feb;41(2):312-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3561-8. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-014-3561-8
PMID:25416645
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The top attributes of excellence of intensive care physicians.重症监护医师卓越的首要特质。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Feb;41(2):312-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3561-8. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
2
[Professional competence for the care of critical patients: beyond specialities].[重症患者护理的专业能力：超越专业领域]
Med Intensiva. 2007 Dec;31(9):473-84. doi: 10.1016/s0210-5691(07)74854-4.
3
Seven years since defining the top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care - what did it lead to and where are we now?自确定医生提供的院前重症护理的五大研究重点以来的七年——这带来了什么，我们现在处于什么状况？
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Nov 20;26(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0562-6.
4
First, do no harm: less training ≠ quality care.首先，勿伤为先：培训不足≠优质护理。
Chest. 2012 Jul;142(1):5-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1354.
5
Older and wiser: fact or fiction?年纪越大越明智：事实还是虚构？
J Sch Nurs. 2005 Aug;21(4):191-3. doi: 10.1177/10598405050210040101.
6
Toxicity issues surrounding herbal use internationally and the U.S. Foreword.
Dis Mon. 2009 Oct;55(10):591. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2009.04.005.
7
[What requirements do we set for intensive care competence?].[我们对重症监护能力设定了哪些要求？]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2015 Dec 1;135(22):2033-4. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1002.
8
Pulse pressure respiratory variation to predict fluid responsiveness: From an enthusiastic to a rational view.脉压呼吸变异用于预测液体反应性：从热情追捧到理性看待
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015 Feb;34(1):9-10. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
9
Developing characteristics of nursing excellence.卓越护理的发展特点。
Crit Care Nurse. 2008 Aug;28(4):78, 80.
10
Training fellows and residents in paediatric cardiac critical care.培训儿科心脏重症监护领域的进修医生和住院医师。
Cardiol Young. 2016 Dec;26(8):1531-1536. doi: 10.1017/S1047951116002468.

引用本文的文献

1
Human resource management at the intensive care unit: A pragmatic review and future research agenda for building a learning health system.重症监护病房的人力资源管理：构建学习型健康系统的务实综述与未来研究议程
Learn Health Syst. 2023 Oct 18;8(2):e10395. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10395. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
What are the characteristics of excellent physicians and residents in the clinical workplace? A systematic review.优秀临床医师和住院医师的特征有哪些？一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e065333. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065333.
3
Recovery after critical illness: putting the puzzle together-a consensus of 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The nature of excellent clinicians at an academic health science center: a qualitative study.学术型健康科学中心优秀临床医生的特质：一项定性研究。
Acad Med. 2012 Dec;87(12):1715-21. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182716790.
2
Defining excellence in anaesthesia: the role of personal qualities and practice environment.定义麻醉卓越：个人素质和实践环境的作用。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jan;106(1):38-43. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq308. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
3
Clinical excellence in academia: perspectives from masterful academic clinicians.学术界的临床卓越：杰出学术临床医生的观点。
危重病后康复：拼拼凑凑——29 位专家的共识。
Crit Care. 2017 Dec 5;21(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1887-7.
4
Resident reflections on end-of-life education: a mixed-methods study of the 3 Wishes Project.住院医师对临终教育的反思：对“三个愿望”项目的混合方法研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 31;6(3):e010626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010626.
5
Re-tooling critical care to become a better intensivist: something old and something new.重新调整重症监护以成为一名更出色的重症医学专家：旧中有新。
Crit Care. 2015;19 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S3. doi: 10.1186/cc14721. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Sep;83(9):989-94. doi: 10.4065/83.9.989.
4
Monkey see, monkey do: a critique of the competency model in graduate medical education.有样学样：对毕业后医学教育能力模型的批判
Med Educ. 2004 Jun;38(6):587-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01794.x.
5
Assessing the ACGME general competencies: general considerations and assessment methods.评估美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会的总体能力：一般考量与评估方法
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;9(11):1278-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01588.x.
6
Defining and assessing professional competence.界定与评估专业能力。
JAMA. 2002 Jan 9;287(2):226-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.226.
7
Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models.优秀主治医生榜样的特质。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 31;339(27):1986-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812313392706.