Verbruggen Frederick, McLaren Ian P L, Chambers Christopher D
School of Psychology, Exeter University, Exeter, United Kingdom.
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;9(5):497-524. doi: 10.1177/1745691614526414.
For centuries, human self-control has fascinated scientists and nonscientists alike. Current theories often attribute it to an executive control system. But even though executive control receives a great deal of attention across disciplines, most aspects of it are still poorly understood. Many theories rely on an ill-defined set of "homunculi" doing jobs like "response inhibition" or "updating" without explaining how they do so. Furthermore, it is not always appreciated that control takes place across different timescales. These two issues hamper major advances. Here we focus on the mechanistic basis for the executive control of actions. We propose that at the most basic level, action control depends on three cognitive processes: signal detection, action selection, and action execution. These processes are modulated via error-correction or outcome-evaluation mechanisms, preparation, and task rules maintained in working and long-term memory. We also consider how executive control of actions becomes automatized with practice and how people develop a control network. Finally, we discuss how the application of this unified framework in clinical domains can increase our understanding of control deficits and provide a theoretical basis for the development of novel behavioral change interventions.
几个世纪以来,人类的自我控制一直吸引着科学家和非科学家。当前的理论通常将其归因于执行控制系统。然而,尽管执行控制在各个学科中都备受关注,但其大多数方面仍未得到充分理解。许多理论依赖于一组定义不明确的“小人”来执行诸如“反应抑制”或“更新”等任务,却没有解释它们是如何做到的。此外,人们并不总是认识到控制是在不同的时间尺度上进行的。这两个问题阻碍了重大进展。在这里,我们关注行动执行控制的机制基础。我们提出,在最基本的层面上,行动控制取决于三个认知过程:信号检测、行动选择和行动执行。这些过程通过错误纠正或结果评估机制、准备以及工作记忆和长期记忆中维持的任务规则进行调节。我们还考虑了行动的执行控制如何随着练习而自动化,以及人们如何发展出一个控制网络。最后,我们讨论了这个统一框架在临床领域的应用如何能够增进我们对控制缺陷的理解,并为开发新的行为改变干预措施提供理论基础。