Center for Open Science.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):525-48. doi: 10.1037/bul0000005. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
Psychological distance and abstraction both represent key variables of considerable interest to researchers across cognitive, social, and developmental psychology. Moreover, largely inspired by construal level theory, numerous experiments across multiple fields have now connected these 2 constructs, examining how psychological distance affects the level of abstraction at which people mentally represent the world around them. The time is clearly ripe for a quantitative synthesis to shed light on the relation between these constructs and investigate potential moderators. To this end, we conducted 2 meta-analyses of research examining the effects of psychological distance on abstraction and its downstream consequences. Across 106 papers containing a total of 267 experiments, our results showed a reliable and medium-sized effect of psychological distance on both level of abstraction in mental representation and the downstream consequences of abstraction. Importantly, these effects replicate across time, researchers, and settings. Our analyses also identified several key moderators, including the size of the difference in distance between 2 levels of a temporal distance manipulation and the dependent variable's capacity to tap processing of both abstract and concrete features (rather than only one or the other). We discuss theoretical and methodological implications, and highlight promising avenues for future research.
心理距离和抽象都代表了认知、社会和发展心理学领域的研究人员非常感兴趣的关键变量。此外,受构念水平理论的极大启发,现在许多跨领域的实验已经将这两个结构联系起来,研究心理距离如何影响人们对周围世界的心理表现的抽象水平。现在显然是进行定量综合分析以阐明这些结构之间的关系并研究潜在的调节因素的时候了。为此,我们对研究心理距离对抽象及其下游后果的影响的研究进行了 2 项荟萃分析。在包含 267 项实验的 106 篇论文中,我们的结果表明,心理距离对心理表现中的抽象水平和抽象的下游后果都有可靠的中等影响。重要的是,这些影响在时间、研究人员和环境中都得到了复制。我们的分析还确定了几个关键的调节因素,包括时间距离操纵的两个水平之间距离差异的大小以及因变量是否能够同时处理抽象和具体特征(而不仅仅是一个或另一个)。我们讨论了理论和方法上的意义,并强调了未来研究的有前途的途径。