Park So Young, Jung Young Hoon, Oh Jeong-Hoon
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):326-30. doi: 10.1177/0194599814559384. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
Keratosis obturans (KO) and external auditory canal cholesteatoma (EACC) have been considered separate entities. While the disorders are distinct, they share many overlapping characteristics, making a correct diagnosis difficult. In the present study, we compared their clinical characteristics and radiological features to clarify the diagnostic criteria.
Retrospective case series.
Academic medical center.
The clinical data of 23 cases of EACC and KO were retrospectively reviewed. The following clinical characteristics were compared between the 2 groups: sex, age, onset of symptoms, follow-up period, audiometric results, and imaging findings on temporal bone computed tomography including bilaterality, location, and the presence of extension to adjacent tissue.
The mean age of the EACC group was significantly older than that of the KO group. All of the cases of EACC occurred unilaterally, and bilateral occurrences of KO were observed in 4 of 9 cases. All of the lesions in the KO group were circumferential, and no lesion in the EACC group invaded the superior canal wall. No significant differences in symptoms, such as acute otalgia, otorrhea, and hearing loss, were noted between the 2 groups. The incidence of conductive hearing impairment more than 10 dB was higher in the KO group than in the EACC group.
Thus, KO and EACC are 2 distinct disease entities that share common features in clinical characteristics except for predominant age and bilaterality. Conservative treatment with meticulous cleaning of the lesion was successful in most cases with a long-term follow-up.
阻塞性角化病(KO)和外耳道胆脂瘤(EACC)一直被视为不同的疾病实体。虽然这两种疾病有所不同,但它们有许多重叠的特征,这使得正确诊断变得困难。在本研究中,我们比较了它们的临床特征和影像学特征,以明确诊断标准。
回顾性病例系列研究。
学术医疗中心。
回顾性分析23例EACC和KO患者的临床资料。比较两组患者的以下临床特征:性别、年龄、症状出现时间、随访时间、听力测试结果以及颞骨计算机断层扫描的影像学表现,包括双侧性、病变位置以及是否侵犯相邻组织。
EACC组的平均年龄显著高于KO组。所有EACC病例均为单侧发病,而9例KO患者中有4例为双侧发病。KO组所有病变均呈环形,EACC组无一例病变侵犯上半规管。两组在急性耳痛、耳漏和听力损失等症状方面无显著差异。KO组传导性听力损失超过10dB的发生率高于EACC组。
因此,KO和EACC是两种不同的疾病实体,除了主要的年龄和双侧性特征外,它们在临床特征上有共同之处。在大多数长期随访的病例中,通过仔细清理病变的保守治疗取得了成功。