Patterson James J, Smith Carl, Bellamy Jennifer
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Hartley Teakle Building 83, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia,
Environ Manage. 2015 Feb;55(2):479-95. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0409-5. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
Enabling and enacting 'practical action' (i.e., purposeful and concerted collective action) in catchments is a key challenge in responding to a wide range of pressing catchment and natural resource management (NRM) issues. It is particularly a challenge in responding to 'wicked problems,' where generating action is not straightforward and cannot be brought about solely by any single actor, policy or intervention. This paper responds to the critical need to better understand how practical action can be generated in catchments, by conducting an in-depth empirical case study of efforts to manage nonpoint source (NPS) pollution in South East Queensland (SEQ), Australia. SEQ has seen substantial concerted efforts to manage waterway and catchment issues over two decades, yet NPS pollution remains a major problem for waterway health. A novel framework was applied to empirically analyze practical action in three local catchment cases embedded within the broader SEQ region. The analysis focuses on 'enabling capacities' underpinning practical action in catchments. Findings reveal that capacities manifested in different ways in different cases, yet many commonalities also occurred across cases. Interplay between capacities was critical to the emergence of adaptive and contextual forms of practical action in all cases. These findings imply that in order to enable and enact practical action in catchments, it is vital to recognize and support a diversity of enabling capacities across both local and regional levels of decision making and action. This is likely to have relevance for other 'wicked' catchment and NRM problems requiring local responses within broader multiscalar regional problem situations.
在集水区促成并实施“实际行动”(即有目的且协调一致的集体行动),是应对一系列紧迫的集水区和自然资源管理(NRM)问题的关键挑战。在应对“棘手问题”时,这尤其具有挑战性,因为促成行动并非易事,而且不能仅由任何单个行为体、政策或干预措施来实现。本文通过对澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部(SEQ)管理非点源(NPS)污染的努力进行深入实证案例研究,回应了更好地理解如何在集水区产生实际行动这一迫切需求。在过去二十年里SEQ为管理水道和集水区问题做出了大量协同努力,但NPS污染仍然是水道健康的一个主要问题。一个新颖的框架被应用于实证分析SEQ地区三个当地集水区案例中的实际行动。该分析聚焦于支撑集水区实际行动的“促成能力”。研究结果表明,能力在不同案例中以不同方式呈现,但案例之间也存在许多共性。在所有案例中,能力之间的相互作用对于适应性和因地制宜形式的实际行动的出现至关重要。这些发现意味着,为了在集水区促成并实施实际行动,至关重要的是要认识并支持地方和区域决策与行动层面的多种促成能力。这可能与其他需要在更广泛的多尺度区域问题情境中做出地方回应的“棘手”集水区和NRM问题相关。