• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响适应性管理的驱动因素:对澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部水质决策的回顾性评估

Drivers influencing adaptive management: a retrospective evaluation of water quality decisions in South East Queensland (Australia).

作者信息

Dutra Leo X C, Ellis Nick, Perez Pascal, Dichmont Cathy M, de la Mare William, Boschetti Fabio

机构信息

CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research/Wealth from Oceans Flagship, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD, 4002, Australia,

出版信息

Ambio. 2014 Dec;43(8):1069-81. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0537-4. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-014-0537-4
PMID:24973052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4235898/
Abstract

This article analyzes interviews with natural resource managers in South East Queensland (SEQ), Australia. The objectives of the research are (i) to apply and test deductive/inductive text analysis methods for constructing a conceptual model of water quality decision-making in SEQ, (ii) to understand the role of information in the decision-making process, and (iii) to understand how to improve adaptive management in SEQ. Our methodology provided the means to quickly and objectively explore interview data and also reduce potential subjective bias normally associated with deductive text analysis methods. At a more practical level, our methodology indicates potential intervention points if one is to influence the decision-making process in the region. Results indicate that relevant information is often ignored in SEQ, with significant consequences for adaptive management. Contextual factors (political, social, and environmental) together with effective communication or lobbying strategies often prevent evidence-based decisions. We propose that in addition to generating information to support decisions, adaptive management also requires an appraisal of the true character of the decision-making process, which includes how stakeholders interact, what information is relevant and salient to management, and how the available information should be communicated to stakeholders and decision-making bodies.

摘要

本文分析了对澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部(SEQ)自然资源管理者的访谈。该研究的目标包括:(i)应用和测试演绎/归纳文本分析方法,以构建SEQ水质决策的概念模型;(ii)了解信息在决策过程中的作用;(iii)了解如何改进SEQ的适应性管理。我们的方法提供了快速、客观地探索访谈数据的手段,也减少了通常与演绎文本分析方法相关的潜在主观偏差。在更实际的层面上,如果想要影响该地区的决策过程,我们的方法指出了潜在的干预点。结果表明,在SEQ,相关信息常常被忽视,这对适应性管理产生了重大影响。背景因素(政治、社会和环境)以及有效的沟通或游说策略常常阻碍基于证据的决策。我们建议,除了生成支持决策的信息外,适应性管理还需要对决策过程的真实性质进行评估,这包括利益相关者如何互动、哪些信息与管理相关且显著,以及如何将可用信息传达给利益相关者和决策机构。

相似文献

1
Drivers influencing adaptive management: a retrospective evaluation of water quality decisions in South East Queensland (Australia).影响适应性管理的驱动因素:对澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部水质决策的回顾性评估
Ambio. 2014 Dec;43(8):1069-81. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0537-4. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
2
Enabling and enacting 'practical action' in catchments: responding to the 'wicked problem' of nonpoint source pollution in coastal subtropical Australia.在集水区促成并实施“实际行动”:应对澳大利亚亚热带沿海地区非点源污染这一“棘手问题”。
Environ Manage. 2015 Feb;55(2):479-95. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0409-5. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
3
The development of an Ecosystem Services Framework for South East Queensland.制定大堡礁地区生态系统服务框架。
Environ Manage. 2010 May;45(5):881-95. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9428-z. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
4
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
5
Private land conservation decision-making: An integrative social science model.私人土地保护决策:综合社会科学模型。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 15;302(Pt A):113961. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113961. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
6
Decision making in a human population living sustainably.可持续生存的人类群体中的决策制定。
Conserv Biol. 2012 Oct;26(5):760-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01911.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
7
Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions.支持多方利益相关者的环境决策。
J Environ Manage. 2008 Sep;88(4):607-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.020. Epub 2007 May 3.
8
Stakeholder Participation in Freshwater Monitoring and Evaluation Programs: Applying Thresholds of Potential Concern within Environmental Flows.利益相关者参与淡水监测和评估计划:在环境流中应用潜在关注阈值。
Environ Manage. 2018 Mar;61(3):408-420. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0940-2. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
9
A Method for Catchment Scale Mapping of Groundwater-Dependent Ecosystems to Support Natural Resource Management (Queensland, Australia).一种用于绘制依赖地下水生态系统的集水区尺度地图以支持自然资源管理的方法(澳大利亚昆士兰州)
Environ Manage. 2016 Feb;57(2):432-49. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0612-z. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
10
Adaptive management of animal populations with significant unknowns and uncertainties: a case study.具有重大未知和不确定性的动物种群的适应性管理:案例研究。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Jul;28(5):1325-1341. doi: 10.1002/eap.1734. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Management strategy evaluation: a powerful tool for conservation?管理策略评估:保护的有力工具?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Sep;26(9):441-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
2
Analyzing the data-rich-but-information-poor syndrome in Dutch water management in historical perspective.从历史角度分析荷兰水资源管理中存在的数据丰富但信息匮乏的现象。
Environ Manage. 2010 May;45(5):1231-42. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9459-5. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
3
Panaceas and diversification of environmental policy.万灵药与环境政策的多样化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 25;104(39):15206-11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702096104. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
4
Is adaptive management helping to solve fisheries problems?适应性管理是否有助于解决渔业问题?
Ambio. 2007 Jun;36(4):304-7. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[304:iamhts]2.0.co;2.
5
Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management.解构适应性管理:应用于环境管理的标准
Ecol Appl. 2006 Dec;16(6):2411-25. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2411:damcfa]2.0.co;2.
6
Using risk communication to disclose the outcome of a participatory decision-making process: effects on the perceived acceptability of risk-policy decisions.
Risk Anal. 2003 Apr;23(2):281-9. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00308.