• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有快速分娩史的女性引产。

Induction of labor in women with a history of fast labor.

作者信息

Kenny Tiffany H, Fenton Bradford W, Melrose Erica L, McCarroll Michele L, von Gruenigen Vivian E

机构信息

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Summa Health System , Akron , OH , USA and.

b SSM Medical Group , St. Louis , MO , USA.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(1):148-53. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.991710. Epub 2014 Dec 30.

DOI:10.3109/14767058.2014.991710
PMID:25424375
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

History of fast labor is currently subjectively defined and inductions for non-medical indications are becoming restricted. We hypothesized that women induced for a history of fast labor do not have faster previous labors and do not deliver more quickly.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control cohort design studied multiparas undergoing elective induction at one high risk center. Outcomes of dyads electively induced for a history of previous fast labor indication (PFast) were compared to controls with a psychosocial indication.

RESULTS

A total of 612 elective inductions with 1074 previous deliveries were evaluated: 81 (13%) PFast and 531 (87%) control. PFast had faster previous labors (median 5.5 h, IQR: 4.5-6) versus. control (10 h, IQR: 9-10.5; p < 0.001). Subsequent delivery time from start to expulsion was shorter for PFast (median 7 h, IQR: 5-9, p < 0.001) than controls with and without a previous labor <5.5 h (8.6 h, IQR: 6-14 and 9.5 h, IQR: 7-15, respectively). PFast were less likely to have a serious maternal complication. Neonatal complications were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients induced for a history of fast labor do have faster previous labors, suggesting a significant history of fast labor can be defined as <5.5 h. These women deliver more quickly and with lower morbidity than controls when subsequently induced, therefore the benefit may warrant the risk for a select number of women with a history of a prior labor length <5.5 h.

摘要

目的

目前,急产史是通过主观定义的,且针对非医学指征的引产正受到限制。我们推测,因急产史而引产的女性既往分娩并不更快,且此次分娩也不会更快。

方法

采用回顾性病例对照队列设计,研究在一个高危中心接受择期引产的经产妇。将因既往急产指征(PFast)而接受择期引产的母婴结局与有心理社会指征的对照组进行比较。

结果

共评估了612例择期引产及1074次既往分娩:81例(13%)为PFast,531例(87%)为对照组。PFast既往分娩更快(中位数5.5小时,四分位间距:4.5 - 6小时),而对照组为(10小时,四分位间距:9 - 10.5小时;p < 0.001)。PFast从开始到分娩的后续分娩时间(中位数7小时,四分位间距:5 - 9小时,p < 0.001)比既往分娩时间<5.5小时和≥5.5小时的对照组(分别为8.6小时,四分位间距:6 - 14小时和9.5小时,四分位间距:7 - 15小时)更短。PFast发生严重母体并发症的可能性较小。新生儿并发症相似。

结论

因急产史而引产的患者既往分娩确实更快,提示急产史可定义为<5.5小时。这些女性在随后引产时分娩更快且发病率低于对照组,因此对于既往分娩时长<5.5小时的部分女性而言,获益可能值得冒此风险。

相似文献

1
Induction of labor in women with a history of fast labor.有快速分娩史的女性引产。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(1):148-53. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.991710. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
2
Adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in elective and medically indicated inductions of labor at term.足月选择性引产和医学指征引产的不良产科及新生儿结局
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Nov;26(16):1595-601. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.795533. Epub 2013 May 15.
3
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies.择期引产低危足月妊娠的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):249.e1-249.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.016. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
4
A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.足月使用引产药物的产科结局比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Apr;27(6):592-6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.831066. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
5
Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.择期引产初产妇的产程进展及剖宫产风险
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):698-704. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b.
6
Induction of labor in the absence of standard medical indications: incidence and correlates.无标准医学指征情况下的引产:发生率及相关因素
Med Care. 2007 Jun;45(6):505-12. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180330e26.
7
Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.选择性引产与自然分娩的关联及结局
J Reprod Med. 2005 Apr;50(4):235-40.
8
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).有剖宫产史产妇的分娩:法国妇产科医生学院(CNGOF)临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
9
When has an induction failed?引产在何时失败?
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):705-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000157437.10998.e7.
10
Elective induction of labor in multiparous women. Does it increase the risk of cesarean section?经产妇的选择性引产。这会增加剖宫产的风险吗?
J Reprod Med. 2002 May;47(5):399-403.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicolegal Evaluation of an Abandoned Dead Neonate: A Case Report.医疗法律评估一例被遗弃的死产新生儿:病例报告。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Mar 31;59(235):292-294. doi: 10.31729/jnma.6292.