Monto A S, Schwartz S A, Albrecht J K
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor 48109.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Mar;33(3):387-90. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.3.387.
Past studies conducted in Australian and American families have demonstrated that alpha 2b interferon (IFN) is effective in preventing rhinovirus-associated illnesses in exposed family members. IFN had been used by intranasal application for 7 days after exposure (5 x 10(6) IU/day). We used the same approach but with only 5 days of spraying (5 x 10(6) IU on day 1 and 2.5 x 10(6) IU on each subsequent day). This amount has been effective in studies involving seasonal prophylaxis. During the study period, a total of 178 rhinoviruses were isolated from the 199 enrolled families in Tecumseh, Mich. There were 434 courses of IFN use and 434 courses of placebo use. Although rhinoviruses were less frequently isolated from those using IFN than those using the placebo, no differences favoring IFN treatment could be found in any of the symptomatic episodes. In fact, more episodes were observed in IFN recipients than in placebo recipients, although the differences were not statistically significant. Additionally, there was no evidence of modification of the severity of episodes of illness. It was concluded that prevention of rhinovirus illness episodes postexposure required a dosage of at least 5 x 10(6) IU of IFN-alpha 2b.
过去在澳大利亚和美国家庭中进行的研究表明,α2b干扰素(IFN)对预防接触过的家庭成员中与鼻病毒相关的疾病有效。暴露后通过鼻内应用IFN 7天(5×10⁶国际单位/天)。我们采用相同的方法,但仅喷雾5天(第1天5×10⁶国际单位,随后每天2.5×10⁶国际单位)。这个剂量在涉及季节性预防的研究中已证明有效。在研究期间,从密歇根州蒂卡姆西的199个登记家庭中共分离出178株鼻病毒。使用IFN的疗程有434个,使用安慰剂的疗程有434个。虽然从使用IFN的人身上分离出鼻病毒的频率低于使用安慰剂的人,但在任何有症状发作中均未发现有利于IFN治疗的差异。实际上,在接受IFN的人中观察到的发作比接受安慰剂的人更多,尽管差异无统计学意义。此外,没有证据表明疾病发作的严重程度有所改变。得出的结论是,暴露后预防鼻病毒疾病发作需要至少5×10⁶国际单位的α2b干扰素。