Dolin R, Reichman R C, Madore H P, Maynard R, Linton P N, Webber-Jones J
N Engl J Med. 1982 Sep 2;307(10):580-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198209023071002.
Four hundred fifty volunteers participated in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of the prophylactic effects of rimantadine and amantadine during an outbreak of influenza A. The subjects received drugs orally at a dose of 100 mg twice a day for six weeks. Influenza-like illness occurred in 41 per cent of the subjects receiving placebo but in only 14 per cent of those receiving rimantadine and 9 per cent of these receiving amantadine (P less than 0.001 for either drug vs. placebo). Laboratory-documented influenza occurred in 21 per cent of placebo recipients, 3 per cent of rimantadine recipients, and 2 per cent of amantadine recipients (P less than 0.001). These findings represent efficacy rates of 85 per cent for rimantadine and 91 per cent for amantadine, as compared with placebo. More recipients of amantadine (13 per cent) than recipients of rimantadine (6 per cent; P less than 0.05) or placebo (4 per cent; P less than 0.01) withdrew from the study because of central-nervous-system side effects. On the basis of this study, rimantadine appears to be the drug of choice for the prophylaxis of influenza A.
450名志愿者参与了一项关于金刚乙胺和金刚烷胺在甲型流感爆发期间预防作用的安慰剂对照、双盲、随机试验。受试者口服药物,剂量为每日100毫克,分两次服用,持续六周。接受安慰剂的受试者中,41%出现了流感样疾病,而接受金刚乙胺的受试者中这一比例仅为14%,接受金刚烷胺的受试者中为9%(两种药物与安慰剂相比,P均小于0.001)。实验室确诊的流感在接受安慰剂的受试者中发生率为21%,接受金刚乙胺的受试者中为3%,接受金刚烷胺的受试者中为2%(P小于0.001)。与安慰剂相比,这些结果表明金刚乙胺的有效率为85%,金刚烷胺为91%。因中枢神经系统副作用退出研究的金刚烷胺受试者(13%)多于金刚乙胺受试者(6%;P小于0.05)或安慰剂受试者(4%;P小于0.01)。基于这项研究,金刚乙胺似乎是预防甲型流感的首选药物。