Lippert Maria Laura, Kousgaard Marius Brostrøm, Bjerrum Lars
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Nov 30;15:193. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0193-6.
Currently, there is a strong focus on the diffusion and implementation of indicator-based technologies for assessing and improving the quality of care in general practice. The aim of this study was to explore how and for what purposes indicator-based feedback is used by the general practitioners (GPs) and how they perceive it to contribute to their work.
Qualitative interviews with nine GPs in two regions in Denmark. The main selection criterion was that the informants had experience with retrieving electronic feedback. The data generation was explorative and open-ended and the analysis took an iterative approach with continuous refinement of themes that emerged from the data.
The study identified two main uses of feedback: i) Administration of a regular disease control schedule for patients with chronic disease and ii) Routine monitoring of outcomes for purposes of resource prioritisation and medication management. Both uses were deemed valuable by the GPs, but also as an additional extra to the clinical core task. All the GPs experienced the feedback to be of limited relevance to the most central and challenging aspects of clinical work understood as the care for individuals. This led to different reactions: Some GPs would use the feedback as a point of departure for broader deliberations about individual patient needs and treatment approaches. For others, the perceived limitations decreased their overall motivation to seek feedback.
The study points to the importance of clarifying limitations as well as possibilities with respect to different aspects of clinical quality when introducing indicator-based technologies to practitioners. The results also emphasize that an indicator-based approach to quality improvement should not stand alone in general practice since some of the most central and challenging aspects of clinical work are not covered by this approach.
目前,人们高度关注基于指标的技术在全科医疗中评估和改善医疗质量方面的推广与应用。本研究的目的是探讨全科医生如何以及出于何种目的使用基于指标的反馈,以及他们如何看待这种反馈对其工作的贡献。
对丹麦两个地区的九名全科医生进行定性访谈。主要入选标准是受访者有获取电子反馈的经验。数据收集具有探索性且开放式,分析采用迭代方法,不断完善从数据中浮现的主题。
该研究确定了反馈的两种主要用途:i)为慢性病患者管理定期疾病控制计划;ii)为资源优先级确定和药物管理目的对结果进行常规监测。全科医生认为这两种用途都很有价值,但也是临床核心任务之外的额外工作。所有全科医生都认为反馈与被视为个体护理的临床工作中最核心和最具挑战性的方面相关性有限。这导致了不同的反应:一些全科医生会将反馈作为更广泛思考个体患者需求和治疗方法的出发点。对另一些人来说,感知到的局限性降低了他们寻求反馈的总体积极性。
该研究指出,在向从业者引入基于指标的技术时,明确临床质量不同方面的局限性以及可能性很重要。研究结果还强调,在全科医疗中,基于指标的质量改进方法不应孤立存在,因为这种方法并未涵盖临床工作中一些最核心和最具挑战性的方面。