• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is it time to abandon care planning in mental health services? A qualitative study exploring the views of professionals, service users and carers.是否到了放弃精神卫生服务中的照护计划的时候了?一项探索专业人员、服务使用者和照护者观点的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):597-605. doi: 10.1111/hex.12650. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
2
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.EQUIP培训培训者:对一项针对参与精神卫生专业人员用户参与式护理计划培训的服务使用者和护理者的培训项目的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
3
What does 'safe care' mean in the context of community-based mental health services? A qualitative exploration of the perspectives of service users, carers, and healthcare providers in England.在社区心理健康服务背景下,“安全护理”是什么意思?对英格兰的服务使用者、照顾者和医疗保健提供者的观点进行的定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):1053. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11473-3.
4
Carers' experiences of involvement in care planning: a qualitative exploration of the facilitators and barriers to engagement with mental health services.护理人员参与护理计划的经历:对参与心理健康服务的促进因素和障碍的质性探索。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 29;15:208. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0590-y.
5
Service user and carer involvement in mental health care safety: raising concerns and improving the safety of services.服务使用者和护理者参与精神卫生保健安全:提出关切并改善服务安全性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 17;18(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3455-5.
6
Understanding experiences of and preferences for service user and carer involvement in physical health care discussions within mental health care planning.了解服务使用者和护理者参与精神卫生保健规划中身体健康护理讨论的经历和偏好。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 13;17(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1287-1.
7
8
Evaluation of a co-delivered training package for community mental health professionals on service user- and carer-involved care planning.针对社区心理健康专业人员开展的关于服务使用者和护理者参与护理计划的联合培训包评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):358-366. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12378. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
9
Adapting a social network intervention for use in secondary mental health services using a collaborative approach with service users, carers/supporters and health professionals in the United Kingdom.采用协作方式,联合英国的服务使用者、护理人员/支持者和卫生专业人员,对一个社交网络干预措施进行改编,将其用于二级精神卫生服务。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 9;22(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08521-1.
10
Service user involvement for mental health system strengthening in India: a qualitative study.印度加强精神卫生系统中的服务使用者参与:一项定性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 28;16:269. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0981-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Nursing Practice: An Integrative Review.人工智能在精神科护理实践中的未来:一项综合综述。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e70003. doi: 10.1111/inm.70003.
2
An Ideal-Type Analysis of People's Perspectives on Care Plans Received from the Emergency Department following a Self-Harm or Suicidal Crisis.自伤或自杀危机后从急诊科获得的护理计划的人们观点的理想类型分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 4;20(19):6883. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20196883.
3
Adapting a social network intervention for use in secondary mental health services using a collaborative approach with service users, carers/supporters and health professionals in the United Kingdom.采用协作方式,联合英国的服务使用者、护理人员/支持者和卫生专业人员,对一个社交网络干预措施进行改编,将其用于二级精神卫生服务。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 9;22(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08521-1.
4
Personalized care planning and shared decision making in collaborative care programs for depression and anxiety disorders: A systematic review.个性化护理计划和共病抑郁焦虑障碍协同护理方案中的共享决策制定:系统综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 10;17(6):e0268649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268649. eCollection 2022.
5
Stakeholder perspective on barrier to the implementation of Advance Care Planning in a traditionally paternalistic healthcare system.利益相关者对传统家长式医疗体系中实施预立医疗照护计划的障碍的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0242085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242085. eCollection 2020.
6
Using peer workers with lived experience to support the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a qualitative study of consumer, carer and clinician perspectives.利用有实际生活经验的同伴工作者来支持边缘型人格障碍的治疗:对消费者、照顾者和临床医生观点的定性研究
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2020 Sep 2;7:20. doi: 10.1186/s40479-020-00135-5. eCollection 2020.
7
Civic engagement and mental health system strengthening in Indonesia: a qualitative examination of the views of health professionals and national key stakeholders.印度尼西亚的公民参与和精神卫生系统强化:卫生专业人员和国家主要利益攸关方观点的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02575-3.
8
Negotiating support from relationships and resources: a longitudinal study examining the role of personal support networks in the management of severe and enduring mental health problems.从关系和资源中争取支持:一项纵向研究,考察个人支持网络在严重和持久的心理健康问题管理中的作用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 7;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2458-z.
9
Exploring the potential use of patient and public involvement to strengthen Indonesian mental health care for people with psychosis: A qualitative exploration of the views of service users and carers.探索患者和公众参与在加强印度尼西亚精神病患者精神卫生保健方面的潜在作用:服务使用者和照顾者观点的定性探索。
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):377-387. doi: 10.1111/hex.13007. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
10
'He's my mate you see': a critical discourse analysis of the therapeutic role of companion animals in the social networks of people with a diagnosis of severe mental illness.“你瞧,它是我的伙伴”:对伴侣动物在被诊断患有严重精神疾病者社交网络中的治疗作用的批判性话语分析
Med Humanit. 2019 Sep;45(3):326-334. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2018-011633. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety in psychiatric inpatient care: The impact of risk management culture on mental health nursing practice.精神科住院护理中的安全:风险管理文化对精神科护理实践的影响。
Nurs Inq. 2017 Oct;24(4). doi: 10.1111/nin.12199. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
2
Predictive accuracy of risk scales following self-harm: multicentre, prospective cohort study.自伤后风险量表的预测准确性:多中心前瞻性队列研究
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;210(6):429-436. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.189993. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
3
Ordinary risks and accepted fictions: how contrasting and competing priorities work in risk assessment and mental health care planning.普通风险与公认的虚构观念:不同且相互竞争的优先事项如何在风险评估和精神卫生保健规划中发挥作用。
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):471-483. doi: 10.1111/hex.12474. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
4
Recovery-focused care planning and coordination in England and Wales: a cross-national mixed methods comparative case study.英格兰和威尔士以康复为重点的护理规划与协调:一项跨国混合方法比较案例研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 16;16:147. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0858-x.
5
Implementing a social network intervention designed to enhance and diversify support for people with long-term conditions. A qualitative study.实施一项旨在加强和多样化对慢性病患者支持的社交网络干预措施。一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 29;11:27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0384-8.
6
Bringing meaning to user involvement in mental health care planning: a qualitative exploration of service user perspectives.赋予服务使用者参与精神卫生保健规划的意义:对服务使用者观点的质性探索。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Feb;23(1):12-21. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12275. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
7
Re-inventing care planning in mental health: stakeholder accounts of the imagined implementation of a user/carer involved intervention.重塑心理健康护理计划:利益相关者对一项涉及服务使用者/护理者的干预措施设想实施情况的描述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 30;15:490. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1154-z.
8
Carers' experiences of involvement in care planning: a qualitative exploration of the facilitators and barriers to engagement with mental health services.护理人员参与护理计划的经历:对参与心理健康服务的促进因素和障碍的质性探索。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 29;15:208. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0590-y.
9
A cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation of a training programme for mental health professionals to enhance user involvement in care planning in service users with severe mental health issues (EQUIP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对心理健康专业人员的培训计划的整群随机对照试验及过程评估,以提高重度心理健康问题服务使用者参与护理计划的程度(EQUIP):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Aug 13;16:348. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0896-6.
10
Professional perspectives on service user and carer involvement in mental health care planning: a qualitative study.关于服务使用者和护理者参与精神卫生保健规划的专业观点:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Dec;52(12):1834-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

是否到了放弃精神卫生服务中的照护计划的时候了?一项探索专业人员、服务使用者和照护者观点的定性研究。

Is it time to abandon care planning in mental health services? A qualitative study exploring the views of professionals, service users and carers.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Mental Health Research Group, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):597-605. doi: 10.1111/hex.12650. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12650
PMID:29144591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5980609/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been established that mental health-care planning does not adequately respond to the needs of those accessing services. Understanding the reasons for this and identifying whose needs care plans serve requires an exploration of the perspectives of service users, carers and professionals within the wider organizational context.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the current operationalization of care planning and perceptions of its function within mental health services from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Participants included 21 mental health professionals, 29 service users and 4 carers from seven Mental Health Trusts in England. All participants had experience of care planning processes within secondary mental health-care services.

METHODS

Fifty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants and analysed utilizing a qualitative framework approach.

FINDINGS

Care plans and care planning were characterized by a failure to meet the complexity of mental health needs, and care planning processes were seen to prioritize organizational agendas and risk prevention which distanced care planning from the everyday lives of service users.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Care planning is recognized, embedded and well established in the practices of mental health professionals and service users. However, it is considered too superficial and mainly irrelevant to users for managing mental health in their everyday lives. Those responsible for the planning and delivery of mental health services should consider ways to increase the relevance of care planning to the everyday lives of service users including separating risk from holistic needs assessment, using support aids and utilizing a peer workforce in this regard.

摘要

背景

心理健康护理计划未能充分满足服务使用者的需求,这一点已得到证实。要了解造成这种情况的原因,并确定护理计划服务于谁的需求,就需要在更广泛的组织背景下,探索服务使用者、照顾者和专业人员的观点。

目的

从多个利益相关者的角度探讨心理健康服务中护理计划的当前运作情况及其功能的看法。

设置和参与者

参与者包括英格兰七个心理健康信托基金的 21 名心理健康专业人员、29 名服务使用者和 4 名照顾者。所有参与者都有在二级精神卫生保健服务中参与护理计划过程的经验。

方法

对参与者进行了 54 次半结构化访谈,并采用定性框架方法进行了分析。

结果

护理计划和护理计划的特点是未能满足心理健康需求的复杂性,护理计划过程优先考虑组织议程和风险预防,这使得护理计划与服务使用者的日常生活脱节。

讨论和结论

护理计划在精神卫生专业人员和服务使用者的实践中得到认可、嵌入和很好的确立。然而,它被认为过于肤浅,主要与用户无关,无法在日常生活中管理他们的心理健康。负责规划和提供心理健康服务的人员应考虑采取措施,增加护理计划对服务使用者日常生活的相关性,包括将风险与整体需求评估分开、使用支持辅助工具,并在这方面利用同行劳动力。