Yoh Tomoaki, Okamura Ryuji, Nobuto Yoshinari, Wada Seidai, Nakamura Yuya, Kato Tatsushi, Nakayama Hiroyuki
Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Sep;61(134):1489-93.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The timing of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) remains controversial. Traditionally, LC for AC is performed within 3 days. We designed this study so that the cut-off time of LC for AC was within 7 days of admission, based on severity.
A total of 103 patients were divided into 2 groups: patients undergoing LC within 7 days of admission [early LC (ELC), n = 41] and patients undergoing LC between 8 days and 5 weeks of admission [delayed LC (DLC), n = 62]. The outcomes compared were complication rate, conversion rate, postoperative hospital days, and operation time. Statistical analyses were performed in mild, moderate and all AC cases. Results: Of all AC cases, successful LC was performed in 93 patients, and no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. In DLC for moderate AC, percutaneous cholecystectomy (PC) with or without endoscopic nasal bile drainage (ENBD) was performed more frequently than ELC.
DLC had no advantage over ELC. ELC for AC is preferable in cost–effect. Even if the operation cannot be scheduled early, proper initial treatment, including percutaneous cholecystectomy with or without endoscopic nasal bile drainage for moderate AC, enables DLC a safe option.
背景/目的:急性胆囊炎(AC)行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的时机仍存在争议。传统上,AC的LC在3天内进行。我们设计了本研究,根据严重程度将AC行LC的截止时间设定在入院7天内。
共103例患者分为2组:入院7天内行LC的患者[早期LC(ELC),n = 41]和入院8天至5周内行LC的患者[延迟LC(DLC),n = 62]。比较的结果包括并发症发生率、中转率、术后住院天数和手术时间。对轻度、中度和所有AC病例进行了统计分析。结果:在所有AC病例中,93例患者成功进行了LC,两组之间未观察到显著差异。在中度AC的DLC中,经皮胆囊切除术(PC)联合或不联合内镜鼻胆管引流(ENBD)的实施频率高于ELC。
DLC并不优于ELC。AC的ELC在成本效益方面更可取。即使手术不能早期安排,适当的初始治疗,包括对中度AC行联合或不联合内镜鼻胆管引流的经皮胆囊切除术,也使DLC成为一种安全的选择。