Negrón Rosalyn, Leyva Bryan, Allen Jennifer, Ospino Hosffman, Tom Laura, Rustan Sarah
Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA 02125, United States.
Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;122:53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
Through two case studies of Catholic parishes in Massachusetts, this study explores the implications of leader-centered versus distributed leadership in Catholic parishes for the implementation of evidence-based health interventions. The two parishes involved in the study differ from each other in several ways. In the first, parishioners are less engaged in leadership activities at the decision-making level in the parish. A small group of lay volunteers work with the parish priest and other ordained leaders on parish activities. In the second parish, a large and active lay volunteer leadership have forged an organizational structure that allows more independence from the pastor's direct oversight. In this parish, lay volunteer leaders are the prime drivers of organizational programs and events. In 2012-2013, three types of networks were assessed at each parish: discussion, collaboration, and outside-of-parish ties. The contrasts between each parish include differences in density of collaboration, in frequency of discussion, and network centrality of the respective parish priests. We further identified key actors in the network structures at each parish. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding organizational capacity in the context of health program implementation.
通过对马萨诸塞州天主教教区的两个案例研究,本研究探讨了天主教教区中以领导者为中心的领导方式与分布式领导方式对实施循证健康干预措施的影响。参与研究的两个教区在几个方面存在差异。在第一个教区,教区居民在教区决策层面较少参与领导活动。一小群非神职志愿者与教区牧师及其他神职领袖一起开展教区活动。在第二个教区,一个庞大且活跃的非神职志愿者领导层构建了一种组织结构,使其能够在很大程度上独立于牧师的直接监督。在这个教区,非神职志愿者领袖是组织项目和活动的主要推动者。在2012年至2013年期间,对每个教区的三种网络类型进行了评估:讨论网络、协作网络和教区外联系网络。每个教区之间的差异包括协作密度、讨论频率以及各自教区牧师的网络中心性方面的不同。我们进一步确定了每个教区网络结构中的关键参与者。我们讨论了这些研究结果对于理解健康项目实施背景下的组织能力的意义。