Suppr超能文献

个体间配对关联刺激后效应的变异性可以通过阈值追踪方法的短间隔皮质内抑制来预测。

Inter-individual variation in the after-effect of paired associative stimulation can be predicted from short-interval intracortical inhibition with the threshold tracking method.

机构信息

Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Neurology Department, Tokushima University School of Medicine, Tokushima, Japan; Neurology Department, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.

Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):105-13. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Paired associative stimulation (PAS), which is used to test a long term potentiation (LTP)-like effect, involves repeated pairing of peripheral somatosensory input with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) given 25 ms later over M1 (PAS25). The effect is usually quantified as an increase in amplitude of motor evoked potentials evoked by single pulse TMS. However, the effect varies greatly between individuals.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that variability depends on either the individual level of GABAAergic activity in cortex, or on the proportion of late I-wave inputs that are evoked by TMS pulses during PAS25. Low levels of GABA facilitate LTP, whereas late I-waves are the site of facilitation after PAS25.

METHODS

GABAAergic inhibition was quantified using SICI measured with a threshold tracking method (SICI-TT) before and after PAS25 in 18 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

The PAS25 effect correlated with the level of SICI-TT (r = 0.6) before PAS25. Contrary to the GABA hypothesis, people who had good facilitation after PAS25 had good inhibition measured by SICI-TT. On completion of the PAS25 protocol, SICI-TT was reduced by an amount correlated with the size of the PAS25 effect (r = 0.5-0.6 at an interstimulus interval of 2.5-3.0 ms).

CONCLUSIONS

SICI is known to target late I-waves, thus SICI-TT will depend on the proportion of late I-waves evoked by the TMS test pulse. If the pulse recruits a large fraction of late I-waves, individuals will show good SICI-TT; they will also respond well to PAS25 since this relies on facilitation of late I-waves.

摘要

背景

配对关联刺激(PAS)用于测试类似长时程增强(LTP)的效应,涉及外周感觉输入与经颅磁刺激(TMS)的重复配对,TMS 在 25 毫秒后给予 M1(PAS25)。该效应通常通过单脉冲 TMS 诱发的运动诱发电位的幅度增加来量化。然而,个体之间的差异很大。

目的/假设:我们假设变异性取决于皮质 GABAergic 活性的个体水平,或者取决于 PAS25 期间 TMS 脉冲诱发的晚期 I 波输入的比例。低水平的 GABA 促进 LTP,而晚期 I 波是 PAS25 后的易化部位。

方法

在 18 名健康志愿者中,使用阈值追踪方法(SICI-TT)测量 PAS25 前后的 GABAergic 抑制来量化 GABAergic 抑制。

结果

PAS25 效应与 PAS25 前的 SICI-TT 水平相关(r=0.6)。与 GABA 假说相反,PAS25 后易化良好的人,其 SICI-TT 测量的抑制也良好。完成 PAS25 方案后,SICI-TT 减少的量与 PAS25 效应的大小相关(在 2.5-3.0 毫秒的刺激间隔下,r=0.5-0.6)。

结论

已知 SICI 靶向晚期 I 波,因此 SICI-TT 将取决于 TMS 测试脉冲诱发的晚期 I 波的比例。如果脉冲募集了大量的晚期 I 波,个体将表现出良好的 SICI-TT;他们也会对 PAS25 反应良好,因为这依赖于晚期 I 波的易化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验