Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Virginia Tech University, United States.
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Dec;28(8):957-65. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Short Form of the Fear Survey Schedule for Children-Revised (FSSC-R-SF) in non-clinical and clinically referred children and adolescents from the Netherlands and the United States. Exploratory as well as confirmatory factor analyses of the FSSC-R-SF yielded support for the hypothesized five-factor structure representing fears in the domains of (1) failure and criticism, (2) the unknown, (3) animals, (4) danger and death, and (5) medical affairs. The FSSC-R-SF showed satisfactory reliability and was capable of assessing gender and age differences in youths' fears and fearfulness that have been documented in previous research. Further, the convergent validity of the scale was good as shown by substantial and meaningful correlations with the full-length FSSC-R and alternative childhood anxiety measures. Finally, support was found for the discriminant validity of the scale. That is, clinically referred children and adolescents exhibited higher scores on the FSSC-R-SF total scale and most subscales as compared to their non-clinical counterparts. Moreover, within the clinical sample, children and adolescents with a major anxiety disorder generally displayed higher FSSC-R-SF scores than youths without such a diagnosis. Altogether, these findings indicate that the FSSC-R-SF is a brief, reliable, and valid scale for assessing fear sensitivities in children and adolescents.
本研究考察了恐惧调查量表儿童修订版(FSSC-R-SF)在荷兰和美国非临床和临床转介儿童和青少年中的心理测量特性。对 FSSC-R-SF 的探索性和验证性因素分析支持了代表五个领域恐惧的假设五因素结构:(1)失败和批评,(2)未知,(3)动物,(4)危险和死亡,以及(5)医疗事务。FSSC-R-SF 具有令人满意的可靠性,能够评估先前研究中记录的年轻人恐惧和胆怯的性别和年龄差异。此外,该量表的收敛效度较好,与全长 FSSC-R 和替代儿童焦虑量表的显著且有意义的相关性证明了这一点。最后,发现该量表具有判别效度。也就是说,与非临床对照组相比,临床转介儿童和青少年在 FSSC-R-SF 总量表和大多数分量表上的得分更高。此外,在临床样本中,患有主要焦虑障碍的儿童和青少年通常比没有这种诊断的青少年在 FSSC-R-SF 上的得分更高。总之,这些发现表明,FSSC-R-SF 是一种简短、可靠且有效的量表,可用于评估儿童和青少年的恐惧敏感性。