Bellón Juan Ángel, Moreno-Peral Patricia, Motrico Emma, Rodríguez-Morejón Alberto, Fernández Ana, Serrano-Blanco Antoni, Zabaleta-del-Olmo Edurne, Conejo-Cerón Sonia
Centro de Salud El Palo, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Unidad de Investigación del Distrito de Atención Primaria Málaga-Guadalhorce, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Unidad de Investigación del Distrito de Atención Primaria Málaga-Guadalhorce, Málaga, Spain.
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76 Suppl:S22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
To determine the effectiveness of psychological and/or educational interventions to prevent the onset of episodes of depression.
Systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR/MA). We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, OpenGrey, and PROSPERO from their inception until February 2014. Two reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility criteria of all SR/MA, abstracted data, and determined bias risk (AMSTAR).
Twelve SR/MA (156 non-repeated trials and 56,158 participants) were included. Of these, 142 (91%) were randomized-controlled, 13 (8.3%) controlled trials, and 1 (0.6%) had no control group. Five SR/MA focused on children and adolescents, four on specific populations (women after childbirth, of low socioeconomic status, or unfavorable circumstances; patients with severe traumatic physical injuries or stroke) and three addressed the general population. Nine (75%) SR/MA concluded that interventions to prevent depression were effective. Of the 156 trials, 137 (87.8%) reported some kind of effect size calculation. Effect sizes were small in 45 (32.8%), medium in 26 (19.1%), and large in 25 (18.2%) trials; 41 (29.9%) trials were not effective. Of the 141 trials for which follow-up periods were available, only 34 (24.1%) exceeded 12 months.
Psychological and/or educational interventions to prevent onset of episodes of depression were effective, although most had small or medium effect sizes.
确定心理和/或教育干预措施预防抑郁症发作的有效性。
对系统评价和荟萃分析(SR/MA)进行系统评价。我们检索了PubMed、PsycINFO、Cochrane系统评价数据库、OpenGrey和PROSPERO,检索时间从各数据库建库至2014年2月。两名评价者独立评估所有SR/MA的纳入标准,提取数据,并确定偏倚风险(AMSTAR)。
纳入12项SR/MA(156项非重复试验和56158名参与者)。其中,142项(91%)为随机对照试验,13项(8.3%)为对照试验,1项(0.6%)无对照组。5项SR/MA关注儿童和青少年,4项关注特定人群(产后妇女、社会经济地位低或处于不利环境的妇女;严重创伤性身体损伤或中风患者),3项针对普通人群。9项(75%)SR/MA得出预防抑郁症的干预措施有效的结论。在156项试验中,137项(87.8%)报告了某种效应量计算。45项(32.8%)试验的效应量较小,26项(19.1%)试验的效应量中等,25项(18.2%)试验的效应量较大;41项(29.9%)试验无效。在有随访期的141项试验中,只有34项(24.1%)超过12个月。
预防抑郁症发作的心理和/或教育干预措施是有效的,尽管大多数干预措施的效应量较小或中等。