Iacconi Chiara, Thakur Sunitha B, Dershaw David D, Brooks Jennifer, Fry Charles W, Morris Elizabeth A
Breast Unit, USL1 Massa-Carrara, Piazza Monzoni 2, Carrara 54033, Italy.
Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Dec;83(12):2137-2143. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.004.
To evaluate the influence of the amount of fibroglandular breast tissue (FGT) and background-parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on lesion detection, quantitative analysis of normal breast tissue and of breast lesions on DWI.
IRB approved this retrospective study on focal findings at contrast-enhanced (CE)breast MR and DWI performed during July-December 2011. Patients with cysts, previous irradiation,silicone implants and current chemotherapy were excluded. DWI with fat suppression was acquired before dynamic acquisition (b factors: 0.1000 s/mm2) using 1.5 and 3 T scanners. Using correlation with dynamic and T2 images, ROIs were drawn free-hand within the borders of any visible lesion and incontralateral normal breast. Fisher's exact test to evaluate visibility and Wilcoxon-rank-sum test for comparison of ADC values were used. The amount of FGT and BPE was visually assessed by concurrent MRI. Analysis was stratified by menopausal status.
25/127 (20%) lesions were excluded for technical reasons. 65/102 (64%) lesions were visible on DWI (median diameter: 1.85 cm). Mass lesions (M) were more visible (43/60 = 72%) than non-mass enhancement (NME) (22/42 = 52%) and malignant lesions were more visible (55/72 = 76%) than benign(10/30 = 33%). BPE and FGT did not influence visibility of M (p = 0.35 and p = 0.57 respectively) as well as of NME (p = 0.54 and p = 0.10). BPE and FGT did not influence visibility of malignant (p = 0.96 and p = 1.0)and benign lesions (p = 1.0 and p = 0.10). Results were confirmed adjusting for menopausal status. The ADC value of normal breast tissue was not influenced by BPE, while it was lower in predominantly fatty breasts compared to dense ones (p = 0.002).
FGT affects the quantitative evaluation of ADC in normal breast tissue whereas BPE does not.Furthermore, both BPE and FGT do not influence visibility of benign or malignant findings, including both mass lesions and non-mass enhancement, on DWI.
评估乳腺纤维腺组织(FGT)量和背景实质强化(BPE)对病变检测、正常乳腺组织及乳腺病变在扩散加权成像(DWI)上的定量分析的影响。
本回顾性研究经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准,研究对象为2011年7月至12月期间进行的对比增强(CE)乳腺磁共振成像(MR)和DWI检查中的局灶性发现。排除有囊肿、既往接受过放疗、植入硅胶假体及正在接受化疗的患者。在动态采集前使用1.5T和3T扫描仪获取脂肪抑制的DWI图像(b值:0.1000 s/mm²)。通过与动态图像和T2加权图像相关,在任何可见病变边界内及对侧正常乳腺中徒手绘制感兴趣区(ROI)。采用Fisher精确检验评估病变可见性,采用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较表观扩散系数(ADC)值。通过同步MRI对FGT量和BPE进行视觉评估。分析按绝经状态分层。
25/127(20%)个病变因技术原因被排除。65/102(64%)个病变在DWI上可见(中位直径:1.85 cm)。肿块病变(M)比非肿块强化(NME)更易见(43/60 = 72% 比 22/42 = 52%),恶性病变比良性病变更易见(55/72 = 76% 比 10/30 = 33%)。BPE和FGT不影响M(p = 0.35和p = 0.57)以及NME(p = 0.54和p = 0.10)的可见性。BPE和FGT不影响恶性(p = 0.96和p = 1.0)及良性病变(p = 1.0和p = 0.10)的可见性。调整绝经状态后结果得到证实。正常乳腺组织的ADC值不受BPE影响,而与致密型乳腺相比,主要为脂肪型乳腺的ADC值较低(p = 0.002)。
FGT影响正常乳腺组织中ADC的定量评估,而BPE不影响。此外,BPE和FGT均不影响DWI上良性或恶性病变(包括肿块病变和非肿块强化)的可见性。